Skip to content

AMIStem-P 01.18.411Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · AMIStem-P Lat. #1 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AMIStem-P (18)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040720106), received between Dec 20, 2020 and Apr 3, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 3, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 24776967 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AT 5 DAYS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT HEARD A POP AND FELT PAIN AFTER ATTENDING A PHYSICAL THERAPY SESSION DURING EXERCISES THAT INVOLVED WALKING UP STEPS. WHEN THE SURGEON TOOK X-RAYS, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF A FRACTURE BUT THE PATIENT FELT PAIN, SO THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REVISE. DURING THE SURGERY, THE SURGEON FOUND THE STEM A LITTLE BE LOOSE, SO HE REVISED IT WITH A LONGER ONE AND REVISED THE HEAD TOO. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 19642083 ↗
  • InjuryDec 20, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY. THE POST-OP X-RAYS INDICATED THAT THE STEM HAD TOO MUCH OFFSET. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE CUP WAS REVISED RATHER THAN THE STEM AS IT WAS EASIER TO REVISE. THE CUP WAS MEDIALIZED TO REDUCE THE OFFSET.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11043169 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page