Skip to content

AMIStem-P 01.18.412Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · AMIStem-P Lat. #2 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AMIStem-P (18)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040720113), received between Aug 12, 2022 and Nov 28, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Failure to Osseointegrate1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Medical device site infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 28, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ABOUT 3 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO STEM NECK BREAKAGE WHILE THE PATIENT WAS GETTING OUT OF THE CAR. ON THE SAME DAY OF THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT WAS BROUGHT BACK INTO THE OPERATING ROOM TO STABILIZE THE JOINT. CERAMIC HEAD SIZE M WAS REMOVED AND BIOLOX OPTION AND XL SLEEVE WERE IMPLANTED TO STABILIZE THE JOINT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23669496 ↗
  • InjuryApr 10, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL COMPONENTS, PERFORMED A WASHOUT, AND REIMPLANTED PERMANENT HARDWARE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 19079928 ↗
  • InjuryAug 12, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, AN HIP REVISION SURGERY ON THE RIGHT SIDE WAS PERFORMED DUE TO STEM LOOSENING. NO ACETABULAR LOOSENING AND NO INFECTION DETECTED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 15217367 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page