Skip to content

AMIStem-P 01.18.415Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · AMIStem-P Lat. #5 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AMIStem-P (18)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040720144), received between Apr 29, 2021 and Jul 1, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 1, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    PATIENT UNDERWENT PRIMARY THR IN 2020 AND SOON REPORTED PAIN. DURING FOLLOWUP, XRAYS MODIFICATION OF THE FEMURAL BONE WERE NOTICED PREDICTING A POSSIBLE STEM MOBILIZATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, THE STEM WAS CONFIRMED AS MOBILIZED AND REVISED. M-VIZION STEM IMPLANTED AND LINER REVISED WITH DM CONVERTER TO IMPROVE ROM. SURGERY COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 22371285 ↗
  • InjuryApr 29, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    SIGNS OF INFECTION 1 YEAR 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED SUCCESSFULLY ALL IMPLANTS AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 11744397 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page