Skip to content

AMIStem-P Collared 01.18.441Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · AMIStem-P Collared Lat. #1 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AMIStem-P Collared (18)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040720304), received between Jan 27, 2022 and Jul 9, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Output Problem1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Metal Related Pathology1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 9, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO TITANIUM ALLERGY AFTER ABOUT 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL EXISTING IMPLANTS, CEMENTED A HOODED PE HC LINER D 36/E AND QUADRA-P CEMENTED LAT. SIZE 1 AND REVISED THE 32MM BIOLOX DELTA HEAD S TO A 36MM BIOLOX DELTA HEAD M. THE PATIENT HAD A FRACTURE SO THE TITANIUM CABLES WERE REPLACED WITH MBRACE CABLES. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; Implant Pain; Metal Related Pathology

    MAUDE report 25763497 ↗
  • InjuryJan 27, 2022Output Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY REPORTING PAIN AND X-RAYS INDICATED RADIOLUCENCY'S AROUND THE STEM, BUT IT WAS NOT LOOSE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM HEAD AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 13365844 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page