Skip to content

Quadra P femoral stems 01.12.126Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Quadra-P Std. #6 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Quadra P femoral stems (27)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040720472), received between Dec 5, 2023 and Nov 22, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 2 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration2
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Medical device site infection1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 22, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT HAD PRIMARY HIP SURGERY. ON (B)(6) 2021, REVISION SURGERY FOR JOINT LUXATION. HEAD AND LINER REVISED. ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT HAD PAIN AND FEMUR ASEPTIC LOOSENING DUE TO A TRAUMATIC EVENT. THE SURGEON REVISED STEM AND HEAD. ON (B)(6) 2024, EXPLANTATION OF ALL COMPONENTS DUE TO INFECTION (STAPH AUREUS).

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 20757905 ↗
  • InjuryDec 6, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE PATIENT HAD PAIN DUE TO LOOSE STEM. AT ABOUT 3 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR'S PRODUCTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 18272460 ↗
  • InjuryDec 5, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE SURGEON NOTED RADIOLUCENT LINES ON RADIOGRAPHS 4,5 MONTHS AFTER SURGERY AND DIAGNOSED MILD STEM LOOSENING IN ZONE (B)(6) 2014. THE PATIENT DOES NOT COMPLAIN OF ANY PAIN OR DISCOMFORT. REVISION SURGERY IS NOT PLANNED. THE PATIENT WILL BE MONITORED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18266170 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page