Skip to content

Quadra P femoral stems 01.12.144Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Quadra-P Lat. #4 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Quadra P femoral stems (27)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040720564), received between Sep 1, 2021 and Dec 5, 2023 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 5, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE SURGEON NOTED RADIOLUCENT LINES ON RADIOGRAPHS 9 MONTHS AFTER SURGERY AND DIAGNOSED MILD STEM LOOSENING IN ZONE 1/7/8. THE PATIENT DOES NOT COMPLAIN OF ANY PAIN OR DISCOMFORT. REVISION SURGERY IS NOT PLANNED. THE PATIENT WILL BE MONITORED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18266174 ↗
  • InjuryNov 25, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    LEFT HIP REVISION SURGERY 5 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION. CUP, LINER, HEAD, AND STEM REVISED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 12874256 ↗
  • InjuryOct 28, 2021Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO THE STEM BEING TOO ANTEVERTED AFTER THE PRIMARY HIP SURGERY. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED THE STEM ANTEVERTED IN PRIMARY. AT 3 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, SLEEVE, AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12712182 ↗
  • InjurySep 1, 2021Migration; Migration

    2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSIDED STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12405942 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page