Skip to content

M-Vizion Femoral Revision System 01.22.165Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Distal Stem Ø16mm L 220mm straight · Class 2 · Implant

All models of M-Vizion Femoral Revision System (30)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07630040729116), received between Nov 20, 2024 and Nov 20, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Implant Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 20, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Migration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Migration

    THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY SURGERY WITH A COMPETITOR ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. SUBSEQUENTLY, ON THE (B)(6) 2024, THE COMPETITOR STEM AND HEAD WERE REVISED TO MEDACTA IMPLANTS. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR IMPLANTS. SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO ISSUES DETECTED WITH IMPLANTS, ONLY PAIN WAS REPORTED. IT IS UNKNOWN WHETHER OR NOT THE COMPETITOR LINER WAS REVISED, BUT A MEDACTA LINER WAS NOT USED IN ANY SURGERY. THE DISTRICT SALES MANAGER DIDN'T HAVE ANY REPS IN THIS HOSPITAL AREA SO NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. FROM THE ANALYSIS OF THE X-RAYS, IT IS VISIBLE THAT JOINT LUXATION OCCURRED. MOREOVER, THE FEMUR SHAPE APPEARS IRREGULAR, WITH CERCLAGE WIRES AND THE STEM LIKELY SHOWS SIGNS OF SUBSIDENCE, PROBABLY A RESULT OF NON-ADEQUATE PRIMARY STABILITY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 20734636 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page