GMK 3D Metal Tibial Tray 02.12.3D02RRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · 3DMetal Tibial Tray Size 2R · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630345710802), received between Jul 11, 2025 and Jan 23, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Migration1
- Osseointegration Problem1
Patient problems
- Aseptic loosening1
- Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
- Implant Pain1
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- Loss of Range of Motion1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 23, 2026Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 4 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO INSTABILITY AS THE RESULT OF TIBIAL LOOSENING AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE TIBIAL TRAY FROM GMK 3D METAL 2R CEMENTLESS TO A GMK CEMENTED S2 AND UPSIZED THE INSERT FROM 12MM TO 17MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 24162767 ↗InjuryAug 13, 2025Migration; Migration
AT 2 WEEKS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO PAIN THAT WAS IDENTIFIED BY THE SURGEON TO BE CAUSED BY A COLLAPSED TIBIA. PATIENT'S BONE QUALITY WAS POOR AND TIBIAL TRAY UNDERSIZED IMPLANTED IN PRIMARY. THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE INSERT AND TIBIAL BASEPLATE TO PREVENT REPEAT COMPLICATIONS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 22792529 ↗InjuryJul 11, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND STIFFNESS IN THE KNEE DUE TO A NICKEL SENSITIVITY. ABOUT 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED ALL COMPONENTS TO SENSITIN COMPONENTS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PATIENT BROUGHT UP NICKEL SENSITIVITY TO THE DOCTOR BEFORE PRIMARY BUT THE SURGEON WAS NOT CONCERNED. TURNED OUT PATIENT DID HAVE NICKEL SENSITIVITY AND HAD TO HAVE ALL COMPONENTS REVISED.
Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; Loss of Range of Motion
MAUDE report 22477460 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page