Skip to content

GMK 3D Metal Tibial Tray 02.12.3D02RRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · 3DMetal Tibial Tray Size 2R · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630345710802), received between Jul 11, 2025 and Jan 23, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Migration1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 23, 2026Osseointegration Problem

    AT ABOUT 4 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO INSTABILITY AS THE RESULT OF TIBIAL LOOSENING AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE TIBIAL TRAY FROM GMK 3D METAL 2R CEMENTLESS TO A GMK CEMENTED S2 AND UPSIZED THE INSERT FROM 12MM TO 17MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 24162767 ↗
  • InjuryAug 13, 2025Migration; Migration

    AT 2 WEEKS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO PAIN THAT WAS IDENTIFIED BY THE SURGEON TO BE CAUSED BY A COLLAPSED TIBIA. PATIENT'S BONE QUALITY WAS POOR AND TIBIAL TRAY UNDERSIZED IMPLANTED IN PRIMARY. THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE INSERT AND TIBIAL BASEPLATE TO PREVENT REPEAT COMPLICATIONS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 22792529 ↗
  • InjuryJul 11, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND STIFFNESS IN THE KNEE DUE TO A NICKEL SENSITIVITY. ABOUT 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED ALL COMPONENTS TO SENSITIN COMPONENTS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PATIENT BROUGHT UP NICKEL SENSITIVITY TO THE DOCTOR BEFORE PRIMARY BUT THE SURGEON WAS NOT CONCERNED. TURNED OUT PATIENT DID HAVE NICKEL SENSITIVITY AND HAD TO HAVE ALL COMPONENTS REVISED.

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 22477460 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page