Skip to content

Mpact Acetabular System 01.32.154DHTRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Acetabular shell Ø54 Two-holes T · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Mpact Acetabular System (68)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630345798763), received between Feb 11, 2025 and Jan 23, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Osseointegration Problem2
  • Malposition of Device1

Patient problems

  • Implant Pain2
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 23, 2026Osseointegration Problem

    AT ABOUT 3 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE CUP AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THERE WAS NO BONE GROWTH ON THE IMPLANT WHICH WAS THE CAUSE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE D 54 SHELL TO A D 62 MULTI-HOLE SHELL, THE 36MM BIOLOX HEAD S TO A 36MM BIOLOX XL. AND THE D 36/F LINER TO A D 36/G LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 24162759 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2025Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    TWO MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT RETURNED DUE TO PAIN. THE SURGEON DISCOVERED THAT THE ACETABULAR CUP HAD SPUN AND BECOME VERTICAL. A MULTI-HOLE CUP WAS IMPLANTED WITH TWO 25 MM SCREWS, AND THE HEAD AND LINER WERE REVISED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 23837280 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 11, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AT ABOUT TWO MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SHIFTED CUP THAT OCCURRED AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, SCREW, LINER AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 21353075 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page