Skip to content

Mpact 3D Metal Acetabular System 01.38.348MHRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Acetabular shell Ø48 Multi-hole Thin · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630971212565), received between Feb 9, 2023 and May 15, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Osseointegration Problem3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)2
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 15, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    FEW DAYS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY IT WAS NOTICED DURING A POSTOPERATIVE CHECK THAT THE NATIVE ACETABULUM WAS PERFORATED LEADING TO A MOBILIZATION OF THE CUP. DURING THE REVISION, THE SURGEON NOTICED THAT THE STEM WAS MOBILIZED TOO. PROBABLY DUE TO THE STEM BEING UNDERSIZED. SURGEON REVISED ALL COMPONENTS AND SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 22024372 ↗
  • InjuryMay 16, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    THE PATIENT WILL BE REVISED FOR CUP LOOSENING ON THE. INFORMATION WILL BE UPDATED WHEN AVAILABLE AFTER REVISION SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 19328671 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 9, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Osseointegration Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    AT 5 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT HIP FOR MPACT MH 3D METAL MOBILIZATION. COMPETITOR PLATES AND APRICOT USED TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. SURGEON COMMENT: ALTHOUGH IT WAS NOT CLEAR FROM THE CT, THE MRI SHOWED THAT THE BONES HAD FRACTURED AT THE BASE OF THE ACETABULUM, WHICH MAY HAVE CAUSED THE CUP TO MOVE WITHOUT BONE ADHESION.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Pain

    MAUDE report 16334678 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page