AMIStem-P Short Neck 01.18.462Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · AMIStem-P Short Neck STD stem #2 · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630971243668), received between Jan 26, 2022 and May 27, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Fracture1
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
- Migration1
- Positioning Problem1
Patient problems
- Bone Fracture(s)4
- Hip Fracture1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 27, 2025Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT ABOUT 2 WEEKS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND A PERIPROSTHETIC BONE FRACTURE WAS CONFIRMED. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE STEM.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 22087872 ↗InjuryJun 20, 2024Migration; Migration
HIP REVISION DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE THAT WAS CAUSED BY STEM SUBSIDENCE AT 21 DAYS FROM PRIMARY SURGERY. THE STEM IMPLANTED WAS UNDERSIZED. PATIENT'S BONE QUALITY WEAK. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE STEM AND HEAD.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 19573046 ↗InjuryMar 2, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ABOUT 10 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, IT WAS CONFIRMED A POSTERIOR FRACTURE OF THE FEMUR. A SECOND SURGERY WAS PERFORMED AND THE FEMUR WAS FIXED WITH A WIRE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE SURGEON THINKS THE CAUSE MAY BE THE LOAD ON THE FEMUR DUE TO RASPING OR OVERSIZE OF THE IMPLANT; THERE WAS NO SUBSIDENCE, SO IT MAY HAVE BEEN FRACTURED DURING THE SURGERY.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 16467462 ↗InjuryMay 3, 2022Positioning Problem
AT 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, DURING A FOLLOW-UP VISIT, STEM SINKING ASSOCIATED WITH PERI-STEM FRACTURES IS OBSERVED. HOWEVER, THERE WERE NO COMPLAINTS FROM THE PATIENT SUCH AS PAIN, AND SHE WAS ABLE TO WALK WITHOUT PROBLEMS. THE PATIENT REJECT THE REVISION SURGERY, BUT THE SURGEON WILL CONTINUE TO RECOMMEND REVISION SURGERY. FRACTURE LINES MAY BE SEEN ON X-RAYS POST-PRIMARY. IT IS UNCLEAR WHETHER THE OPERATION OF THE RASPS DURING THE SURGERY WAS BAD, BUT IT MAY BE DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE RASPS WERE TAKEN IN AND OUT MANY TIMES DURING THE SURGERY DUE TO UNFAMILIAR SURGERY. BONE QUALITY IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Hip Fracture
MAUDE report 14267059 ↗InjuryJan 26, 2022Fracture; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
DURING THE PRIMARY HIP SURGERY, THE PATIENT SUSTAINED AN INTRAOPERATIVE FEMORAL FRACTURE. THE SURGEON FIXED WITH THE 2 CABLES AND EXPRESSED AN OPINION THAT THE EVENT WAS CAUSED BY A TECHNICAL ERROR. NO FAILURE SEEMED TO BE OBSERVED ON DEVICE.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 13356858 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page