Skip to content

GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.E0410FLRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial Insert Fixed SPHERE FLEX #4/10 mm L E-Cross · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Medacta GMK Sphere knee implant is a cemented, semi-constrained knee replacement with a fixed Sphere Flex tibial insert. The 39 reports mostly describe infection at the surgical site, knee instability or looseness, and reduced range of motion, with 39 injuries and no deaths. In several cases surgeons washed out the joint and swapped in a different insert size. No recalls name this device. Reports in the past 12 months (19) were more than twice the prior 12 months (9).

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
39
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
39
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 39 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630971261754), received between Mar 22, 2023 and Aug 11, 2026 — classified as 39 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (19 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 2 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 2 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 3 reportsFeb 2026: 3 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 3 reportsMay 2026: 2 reportsJun 2026: 2 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 2 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection19
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem16
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1

Patient problems

  • Medical device site infection19
  • Joint Laxity14
  • Loss of Range of Motion3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Implant Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 39 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 11, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    At about 11 month from the primary, the patient came in due to signs of infection and the pathogen is unknown. The surgeon performed a washout and revised the Flex4L - 10mm insert to a same size insert. The surgery was completed successfully.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 50209597 ↗
  • InjuryAug 3, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    At about 1 year and 4 months fro the primary, the patient came in reporting instability due to laxity and the cause of the laxity is unknown. The surgeon revised the GMK-SPHERE Tibial Insert from 10 mm to 13 mm to give the patient more stability. The surgery was completed successfully.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 50114136 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING PAIN AND INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF TRAUMA. AT ABOUT 11 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY SURGERY THE SURGEON REVISED THE GMK-SPHERE TIBIAL INSERT E-CROSS - FLEX 4L - 10MM TO A GMK-SPHERE TIBIAL INSERT E-CROSS - FLEX 4L - 12MM FOR INCREASED STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 25763517 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE 10MM FLEX 4L INSERT TO A SAME SIZE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25632983 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING PAIN DUE TO FAILING COMPETITOR`S SUTURES IN QUAD WHICH RESULTED IN PATELLA TRACKING ISSUES. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF TRAUMA. THE SURGEON ADDRESSED THE SUTURES, PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE FLEX 4L - 10MM INSERT TO A FLEX 4L - 11MM INSERT TO IMPROVE THE STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 25528754 ↗
  • InjuryMay 26, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 4 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN.THE SURGEON PERFORMED SURGICAL WASHOUT AND DEBRIDEMENT, WITH EXCHANGE OF THE INSERT TO ANOTHER INSERT OF THE SAME SIZE.THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25275480 ↗
  • InjuryMay 22, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING DRAINAGE AT THE INCISION SITE OF THE PRIMARY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN I&D OF THE JOINT AND REVISED THE INSERT WITH ANOTHER ONE OF THE SAME SIZE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25253491 ↗
  • InjuryApr 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING STIFFNESS AND LIMITED RANGE OF MOTION AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED SCAR EXCISIONS AND REVISED THE 10MM INSERT TO AN 11MM INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 25039781 ↗
  • InjuryApr 30, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION AFTER 12 DAYS FROM PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE 10MM INSERT TO A SAME SIZE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25039778 ↗
  • InjuryApr 14, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 11 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO TRAUMA REPORTED. THE SURGEON REVISED THE TIBIAL INSERT (FROM 10MMTO 12MM) TO ADDRESS THE INSTABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 24871677 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    REVISION SURGERY AT ABOUT 1 MONTH POST-PRIMARY DUE TO INFECTION. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND THEN REVISED THE 10MM INSERT TO A SAME SIZE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24494906 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER FROM 10MM TO 14MM TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 24454900 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 18, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON IS PERFORMING THE DAIR (DEBRIDEMENT, ANTIBIOTICS, AND IMPLANT RETENTION) TECHNIQUE WITH THE LEFT KNEE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT TO AN INSERT OF THE SAME SIZE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24376307 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 12, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24321118 ↗
  • InjuryJan 29, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIAMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING DRAINAGE FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND POLY EXCHANGE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24208590 ↗
  • InjuryJan 29, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT ONE 1 AND 3 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT FROM 10MM TO 13MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 24208579 ↗
  • InjuryJan 15, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND POLY SWAP. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24078372 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE LINER (10 TO 17MM) TO GIVE THE PATIENT MORE STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23836922 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR 9 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND POLY SWAP. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 23510663 ↗
  • InjuryOct 21, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    ABOUT ONE MONTH POST-PRIMARY, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH SIGNS OF INFECTION OF UNKNOWN CAUSE. THE SURGEON OBSERVED NO DAMAGE OR LOOSENING OF ANY IMPLANTS. THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN INCISION AND DRAINAGE, AND ALSO REVISED THE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 23349014 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 5 MONTHS FROM PRIAMARY PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION FROM UNKNOWN CAUSES. WASHOUT OF KNEE WAS COMPLETED AND CHANGE OF TIBIAL INSERT WAS PERFORMED. SURGEON SACRIFICED PCL DURING THE WASHOUT (DAIR), CONSEQUENTLY IMPLANTED DEVICE WAS A THICKER (14MM) NON-CRUCIATE RETAINING LINER.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22369026 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 2 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22282503 ↗
  • InjuryMay 2, 2025Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    AT ABOUT 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING STIFFNESS. MEDICAL MANIPULATION UNDER ANAESTHESIA HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN ORDER TO RESTORE THE JOINT MOBILITY.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 21950432 ↗
  • InjuryApr 30, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 4 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY DUE TO LAXITY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT TO GIVE THE PATIENT MORE STABILITY (10MM TO 14MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 21933170 ↗
  • InjuryMar 13, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AT ABOUT 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE TIBIA AND KNEE INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE TIBIA AND INSERT (10 TO 17MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 21595456 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page