Skip to content

GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.E0410FRRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial Insert Fixed SPHERE FLEX #4/10 mm R E-Cross · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Medacta GMK Sphere total knee implant, specifically the Sphere Flex tibial insert, is a cemented metal-and-plastic knee replacement. Reports mostly describe infection at the operated knee site and knee instability or laxity, with pain and reduced motion also mentioned; several patients needed washout surgery and revision of the insert. There are 57 reports, 56 injuries and no deaths. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
56
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
55
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 56 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630971261761), received between Sep 26, 2022 and Jul 8, 2026 — classified as 55 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (38 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 2 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 3 reportsJan 2025: 3 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 4 reportsMay 2025: 2 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 2 reportsSep 2025: 2 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 5 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 3 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520265
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection38
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem17
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Medical device site infection26
  • Joint Laxity13
  • Unspecified Infection13
  • Implant Pain4
  • Loss of Range of Motion2
  • Damage to Ligament(s)1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 56 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 8, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 4 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGERY PERFORMED A WASHOUT, I&D, AND REVISED THE FLEX 4RINSERTFROM 10MM TO 11MM AT HIS DISCRETION. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25747715 ↗
  • InjuryJun 30, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT 4 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGERY PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE 10MM INSERT TO THE SAME-SIZE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25663310 ↗
  • InjuryMay 22, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 5 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25253487 ↗
  • InjuryMay 20, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION AFTER ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE FLEX4R - 10 MM INSERT TO A FLEX4R - 14 MM INSERT AT HIS DISCRETION. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25230402 ↗
  • InjuryMay 8, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT HAD ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 2 MOTHS FROM PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT`S NATURAL PATELLA AND REVISED THE 4R - 10 MM INSERT TO A 4R - 11 MM INSERT AT HIS DISCRETION TO IMPROVE KNEE STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 25123208 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 15, 2026Use of Device Problem

    DURING THE PRIMARY RIGHT KNEE SURGERY, THE SURGEON WAS HAVING DIFFICULTY GETTING THE INSERT TO FIT INTO THE TIBIAL TRAY. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED THE FORCE OF PUSH AND HITTING THE INSERT ONTO THE TRAY, BUT IT WOULD NOT SUCCESSFULLY SEAT. THE SURGEON USED A SCALPEL AND TRIMMED THE POSTERIOR LATERAL EDGE OF THE INSERT AND WAS THEN ABLE TO PUSH IT ONTO THE TIBIAL TRAY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24882488 ↗
  • InjuryMar 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 8 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT (FROM 10MM TO 13MM) TO INCREASE STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 24700707 ↗
  • InjuryMar 10, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 2 YEARS 5 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING INSTABILITY IN THE RIGHT KNEE AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE GMK-SPHERE TO A GMK-HINGE SYSTEM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 24558211 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND I&D, AND REVISED THE GMK-SPHERE INSERT 10MM TO A SAME SIZE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24454908 ↗
  • InjuryJan 29, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE INSERT TO A SAME SIZE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24208581 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 8 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON RESURFACED THE PATIENT'S NATURAL PATELLA BONE AS WELL AS UPSIZED THE INSERT (FROM 10 MM TO 12 MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23836937 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT REPORTED PAIN DUE TORUPTURED EXTENSOR MECHANISM. SURGEON PERFORMED AN EXTENSOR MECHANISM REPAIR AND SWAPPED THE POLY TO ONE OF THE SAME SIZE. INFORMATION ON PRIMARY ARE UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Damage to Ligament(s)

    MAUDE report 23836921 ↗
  • InjuryNov 28, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT 2 YEARS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE LINER (FROM 10 TO 13MM) TO GIVE THE PATIENT MORE STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23669518 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 4 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE LINER (10 TO 14MM) TO GIVE THE PATIENT MORE STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23615340 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE POLY TO GIVE THE PATIENT MORE STABILITY (FROM 10 TO 11MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23615338 ↗
  • InjuryNov 5, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT PRIMARY KNEE SURGERY. ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASH OUT AND POLY SWAP. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE SURGEON UTILIZED THE DOUBLE-DAIR TECHNIQUE, A TWO-STAGE REVISION PROCEDURE FOR TREATING ACUTE PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION PERFORMED WITHIN A FEW DAYS. AS PART OF THIS APPROACH, THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS REVISED DURING THE SECOND STAGE ON (B)(6) 2025, AS A PREVENTIVE MEASURE. FINAL INSERT HAS BEEN IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 23477187 ↗
  • InjuryNov 5, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AFTER 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY THE PATIENT CAME IN WITH AN INFECTION AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE POLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 23477173 ↗
  • InjuryOct 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT 11 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO PAIN AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON RESURFACED THE PATELLA AND UPSIZED THE POLY FROM 10MM TO 11MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23291530 ↗
  • InjurySep 19, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AFTER 15 DAYS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION, AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 23093855 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED TO AN UPSIZED POLY (FROM 10 TO 11 MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 22991546 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22902787 ↗
  • InjuryAug 8, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 10 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22749141 ↗
  • InjuryJul 31, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 3 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22673491 ↗
  • InjuryJun 16, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT HAD ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 1 YEAR POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT WITH ONE OF THE SAME THICKNESS AND RESURFACED THE PATIENT'S NATURAL PATELLA AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 22209904 ↗
  • InjuryMay 19, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 1 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING STIFFNESS AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON DOWNSIZED THE INSERT (FROM 10MM TO 8MM) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 22042950 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page