Skip to content

GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.E0411FRRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial Insert Fixed SPHERE FLEX #4/11 mm R E-Cross · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
19
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
19
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 19 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630971261808), received between Mar 14, 2024 and Jul 16, 2026 — classified as 19 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (13 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 2 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 2 reportsJul 2026: 2 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection13
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Medical device site infection11
  • Joint Laxity5
  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Implant Pain1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 19 most recent of 19 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 16, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT HAD KNEE INSTABILITY DUE TO AN ATTENUATED PCL AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF TRAUMA OR A FALL. AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE FLEX 4R - 11MM INSERT TO A FLEX 4R - 13MM FOR INCREASED STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25838717 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    REVISION SURGERY AFTER 1 YEAR DUE TOINFECTION, AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE 11MM FLEX 4R INSERT TO A 12MM FLEX 4R.THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25714726 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING KNEE LAXITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THERE WERE NO INDICATIONS OF TRAUMA. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FLEX 4R INSERT FROM 11 MM TO 13 MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 25632986 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT HAD PRIMARY RIGHT KNEE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE RIGHT 11MM S4 INSERT TO A SAME SIZE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT AGAIN CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT, I&D, AND REVISED THE GMK-SPHERE TIBIAL INSERT E-CROSS - FLEX 4R - 11MM TO A SAME SIZE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25632982 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY AFTER 1 YEAR AND 11 MONTHS DUE TO PAIN AND STIFFNESS IN THE RIGHT KNEE FLEXION AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 11MM INSERT TO A 10MM T TO ADDRESS THE STIFFNESS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 24710846 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24004372 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 5 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 23836930 ↗
  • InjuryNov 5, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AFTER 1 YEAR POST-PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INSTABILITY OF UNKNOWN CAUSE. THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE LINER FROM 11 MM TO 17 MM TO PROVIDE GREATER STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23477177 ↗
  • InjuryJun 4, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22142097 ↗
  • InjuryMay 23, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22078240 ↗
  • InjuryMar 28, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON UPON REVISING DISCOVERED THAT THE LINER WAS DISENGAGED FROM THE TIBIA TRAY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER (11MM TO 14MM) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 21719273 ↗
  • InjuryMar 19, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 1 MONTH FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE LINER (11MM TO 17MM) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 21642253 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER INFECTION, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21102279 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY KNEE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. THE PATIENT HAD AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT HAD AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED ALL MEDACTA HARDWARE AND REIMPLANTED PERMANENT PRODUCT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 20819570 ↗
  • InjuryNov 6, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20619978 ↗
  • InjuryOct 9, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER (11MM) WITH A THICKER ONE (13MM) AND RESURFACED THE PATIENT'S NATURAL PATELLA. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 20408357 ↗
  • InjuryJul 25, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 22 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19824924 ↗
  • InjuryMay 8, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 19269110 ↗
  • InjuryMar 14, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 18901827 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page