Skip to content

GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.E0510FLRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial Insert Fixed SPHERE FLEX #5/10 mm L E-Cross · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Medacta GMK Sphere total knee implant is a cemented metal-and-plastic knee replacement with a fixed bearing insert. The 27 reports mostly describe infection at the operated knee site and looseness or instability of the joint, often leading to revision surgery to swap in a thicker insert; the reports also mention knee pain. There are 27 injuries and no deaths. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
27
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
27
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 27 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630971261990), received between May 3, 2022 and Jul 16, 2026 — classified as 27 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (17 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 2 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 2 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 2 reportsMay 2026: 2 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection17
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem8
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Medical device site infection13
  • Joint Laxity8
  • Unspecified Infection5
  • Implant Pain2
  • Damage to Ligament(s)1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 27 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 16, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE FLEX 5L - 10MM INSERT TO A SAME SIZE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25838712 ↗
  • InjuryMay 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR 11 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THERE WERE NO INDICATIONS OF TRAUMA. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 10MM INSERT TO 12MM INSERT FOR INCREASED STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 25253493 ↗
  • InjuryMay 5, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THERE WERE NO SIGNS OF TRAUMA OR BONE QUALITY ISSUES. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT (FROM 10 MM TO 13MM) FOR INCREASED STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 25077227 ↗
  • InjuryApr 15, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 4 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN AND INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO TRAUMA REPORTED. THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT`S NATURAL PATELLA AND REVISED THE 10MM INSERT TO AN 11MM INSERT TO ADDRESS THE INSTABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 24882487 ↗
  • InjuryApr 14, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO KNEE INSTABILITY ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED TRAUMA. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT FROM A 10MM INSERT TO AN 11MM INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 24871673 ↗
  • InjuryJan 29, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO INFECTION AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED AND WASHOUT AND I&D AND REVISED THE LINER FROM A 10MM TO A 12MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24208580 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24004366 ↗
  • InjuryDec 24, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 6 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE POLY (FROM 10 MM TO 14MM) FOR PATIENT STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23886574 ↗
  • InjuryDec 22, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ONE MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY PROCEDURE DUE TO A TEAR OF THE EXTENSOR MECHANISM, INVOLVING BOTH THE QUADRICEPS AND THE PATELLAR TENDON. NO IMPLANT LOOSENING WAS OBSERVED. A SUSPECTED INFECTION WAS NOTED, AND A COMPLETE OPEN ARTHROTOMY WAS PERFORMED TO MANAGE THE CONDITION.

    Patient problems: Damage to Ligament(s)

    MAUDE report 23864349 ↗
  • InjuryNov 26, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT11 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE LINER (FROM 10 11 MM) TO GIVE THE PATIENT MORE STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23655141 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND POLY SWAP. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 23510672 ↗
  • InjuryOct 20, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AT 1 MONTH FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON NOTED THAT WHEN APPLYING VALGUS STRESS, THE KNEE MEDIALLY DISLOCATED. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT FROM A 10MM TO AN 11MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23336122 ↗
  • InjuryJul 30, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION, AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22664211 ↗
  • InjuryJun 10, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT 1 YEAR FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN AND KNEE INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON RESURFACED THE NATURAL PATELLA AND REVISED THE LINER WITH A THICKER ONE (FROM 10 TO 11 MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain

    MAUDE report 22175034 ↗
  • InjuryMay 21, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22060084 ↗
  • InjuryMay 14, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22016285 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY KNEE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT HAD INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ON (B)(6) 2025 PATIENT HAD SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 21503789 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 11, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT ONE MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 21353083 ↗
  • InjuryJan 29, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 21261987 ↗
  • InjuryAug 26, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20063782 ↗
  • InjuryMay 16, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 19328374 ↗
  • InjurySep 11, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17718218 ↗
  • InjuryJul 19, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17348642 ↗
  • InjuryMar 15, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. AT 21 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 16545758 ↗
  • InjuryJan 20, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 16214806 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page