Skip to content

M-Vizion Femoral Revision System 01.22.409Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Proximal Body Ø20mm L 60mm LAT with holes · Class 2 · Implant

All models of M-Vizion Femoral Revision System (30)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07630971263581), received between Jun 10, 2025 and Jun 10, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 10, 2025Migration; Migration

    ABOUT 5 MONTHS AFTER THE FIRST REVISION SURGERY, ANOTHER REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO SECONDARY MOVEMENT AND SUBSIDENCE. THE PATIENT HAS A FIRST REVISION SURGERY (ON (B)(6) 2025) DUE TO A PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURE CAUSED BY A FALL (PRIMARY SURGERY WAS PERFORMED IN (B)(6) 2013). PSEUDOARTHROSIS OF THE FRACTURE BORDERS IS CURRENTLY PRESENT, ESPECIALLY AROUND THE GREATER TROCHANTER AND ISTMUS REGION OF THE FEMUR. M-VIZION STEM REMOVED WITHOUT FURTHER DIFFICULTIES AND REPLACED WITH COMPETITOR REVISION SHAFT (CORAIL REVISION), PARTIAL REOPENING OF FRACTURE AREA, NEW CERCLAGES, AND PROXIMAL FEMORAL PLATE PLACED TO STABILIZE THE FRACTURE AROUND THE ISTHMUS AND GREATER TROCHANTER. VERSAFIT DM CUP IS STABLE AND HAS GOOD PLACEMENT IN THE ACETABULUM, SO IT WAS LEFT IN SITU. LINER AND HEAD REPLACED WITH THE SAME SIZES.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 22175023 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page