Pantera Pro 2.50/20/140Recalls & reported problems
Biotronik AG · Class 2
All models of Pantera Pro (13)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640130437128), received between Jul 1, 2019 and Mar 20, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Advance2
- Fracture1
- Patient Device Interaction Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Vascular Dissection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 20, 2024Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
AN UNKNOWN STENT WAS INSERTED IN THE LAD. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE COMPLAINT PANTERA PRO WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED FOR PRE-DILATATION IN THE LCX, BUT THE BALLOON DID NOT PASS. A 2ND ATTEMPT WAS MADE BUT THE BALLOON STILL DID NOT CROSS THE SIDE BRANCH. IT WAS DECIDED NOT TO DO THE POBA PROCEDURE YET, CONTINUED TO GIVE MEDICINE TO PATIENT AND MADE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A FOLLOW UP.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18946535 ↗InjuryMay 25, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS INTENDED TO TREAT A MILDLY CALCIFIED ECCENTRIC TYPE B1 LESION (95 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE,) IN A SEGMENT OF THE RCA. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED WITH THE PANTERA PRO 2.5/20 COMPLIANT BALLOON CATHETER ONCE, FOLLOWED BY A PANTERA LEO 3.5/15 NC BALLOON CATHETER, WHICH WAS INFLATED TWICE. AFTER THIS PRE-DILATATION, A LOCALIZED DISSECTION WAS NOTED IN THE TREATED AREA. SUBSEQUENTLY, A SCAFFOLD WAS IMPLANTED AND POST-DILATATION WAS DONE. THEREBY THE DISSECTION WAS FIXED. BOTH BALLOON CATHETERS ARE REPORTED SEPARATELY.
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 17004042 ↗MalfunctionJul 13, 2021Fracture; Fracture
A PANTERA PRO CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER WAS CHOSEN FOR TREATMENT OF A LESION (90 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS MID RCA. AFTER BALLOON WAS USED AND REMOVED FROM PATIENTS BODY, IT WAS ATTEMPTED TO UNSCREW THE INFLATION DEVICE FROM THE HUB BUT THE HUB BROKE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12158859 ↗MalfunctionJul 1, 2019Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
THE PANTERA PRO COULD NOT PASS THE SEVERELY HIGH CALCIFIED LESION IN THE LAD.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8751258 ↗
Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous223 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892815200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 death203 reports
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous162 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892820200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous161 reports
- NC TREK 1012454-08Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 recalls59 reports
- TREK™ 1012272-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 deaths158 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall84 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall1 death83 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page