Orsiro 2.5/18/140Recalls & reported problems
Biotronik AG · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Orsiro (49)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 12
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640130439030), received between Apr 11, 2019 and Jun 10, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries, 10 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated5
- Failure to Advance3
- Material Deformation3
- Material Puncture/Hole1
- Patient Device Interaction Problem1
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient7
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Thrombosis1
- Vascular Dissection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 10, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AN ORSIRO DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION (80 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE) IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS MID RCA. AFTER PRE-DILATATION OF A PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED STENT, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ADVANCE THE STENT TO THE MID RCA. THUS, IT WAS REMOVED AND UPON REMOVAL IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT HAS BEEN DISLODGED FROM THE BALLOON AND STAYED INSIDE THE PATIENTS BODY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11978087 ↗MalfunctionMay 11, 2021Failure to Advance; Material Deformation; Failure to Advance; Material Deformation
AN ORSIRO DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION (90 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE) IN THE SEVERELY TORTUOUS MID CX. STENT WOULD NOT CROSS LESION AND AFTER REMOVAL IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT WAS DAMAGED. MULTIPLE STENTS WERE ATTEMPT TO BE INSERTED BUT NOTHING WAS ABLE TO CROSS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11806259 ↗MalfunctionDec 1, 2020Material Deformation; Material Deformation
AFTER PRE-DILATATION THE ORSIRO COULD NOT CROSS THE SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE MID CX AND A STENT DEFORMATION OCCURRED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10928391 ↗InjuryNov 10, 2020Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
AN ORSIRO US DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. A DISSECTION HAS OCCURRED AT THE EDGE OF THE STENT IN THE PROXIMAL LAD. THE DISSECTION WAS COVERED BY PLACING A SECOND STENT.
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 10818100 ↗MalfunctionJan 16, 2020Material Puncture/Hole; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Puncture/Hole; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AN ORSIRO DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS CHOSEN TO TREAT A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION IN A DISTAL SEVERELY TORTUOUS LAD. AFTER PREPARING THE LESION WITH A ROTABLADE AND PRE-DILATATION THE DEVICE WAS PLACED IN THE LESION. DURING INFLATION THE BALLOON POPPED AT 8 ATM AND THE STENT MIGRATED INTO PATIENTS BODY. THE STENT COULD BE RETRIEVED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9597203 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE ORSIRO DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING PROCEDURE THE STENT DISLODGED FROM THE BALLOON.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9489746 ↗MalfunctionDec 2, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AN ORSIRO DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS CHOSEN TO TREAT A PRE-DILATED SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION. AFTER A FIRST ORSIRO WAS IMPLANTED, A 6F GUIDELINER WAS LACED. THE ORSIRO 2.5/18 WAS INTRODUCED BUT COULD NOT PASS THE PREVIOUS IMPLANTED STENT. UPON REMOVAL THE STENT DISLODGED PRIOR PULLING BACK THROUGH GUIDELINER AND WAS ADAPTED TO THE VESSEL WALL.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9397748 ↗InjuryOct 30, 2019Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
AN ORSIRO DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS CHOSEN TO TREAT A CALCIFIED LESION WITH 85 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE. 4 HOURS AFTER IMPLANTATION PATIENT EXPERIENCED CHEST PAIN. A STENT THROMBOSIS WAS DETECTED.
Patient problems: Thrombosis
MAUDE report 9255568 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2019Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
AN ORSIRO DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS CHOSEN TO TREAT A CALCIFIED LESION. DESPITE PRE-DILATATION IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO CROSS THE LESION WITH THE DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8824070 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2019Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
AN ORSIRO DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS CHOSEN TO TREAT A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION (95 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE). DESPITE PRE-DILATATION IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO CROSS THE LESION WITH THE DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8823178 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AN ORSIRO DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS CHOSEN TO TREAT A CALCIFIED LESION (90% STENOSIS DEGREE) IN A TORTUOUS CX. AFTER DIRECT STENTING THE ORSIRO COULD NOT PASS THE LESION AND THE STENT DISLODGED FROM THE BALLOON DURING WITHDRAWAL. THEREFORE THE UNDEPLOYED STENT WAS COVERED AND TACKED INTO PLACE WITH ANOTHER STENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8737393 ↗MalfunctionApr 11, 2019Material Deformation; Material Deformation
AN ORSIRO DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE ATTEMPT TO CROSS THE CALCIFIED LESION RESISTANCE WAS FELT. THEREFORE THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY AND A STENT DEFORMATION WAS NOTICED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8506552 ↗
Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices
- SYNERGY™ H7493926038300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent8 deaths124 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent7 deaths106 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926020300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent9 deaths90 reports
- XIENCE Sierra™ 1550350-33Abbott Vascular Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent1 recall32 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016250Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths82 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30022UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths76 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926024300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths75 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30015UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths73 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page