Skip to content

Pulsar-18 T3 5/170/135Recalls & reported problems

Biotronik AG · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Pulsar-18 T3 (52)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640130446939), received between Aug 26, 2024 and Feb 20, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Failure1
  • Activation Problem1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Fracture1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2026Fracture

    THE GUIDEWIRE WAS ADVANCED ACROSS THE LESION TO CONFIRM THAT THE VESSEL DIAMETER WAS APPROXIMATELY 5 MM. THE PULSAR-18 T3 STENT SYSTEM WAS THEN ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION AND THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED. DURING WITHDRAWAL OF THE DELIVERY SYSTEM, A FRACTURE OF PART OF THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS IDENTIFIED. THE FRACTURED COMPONENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED AND REMOVED FROM THE BODY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24400795 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 7, 2026Failure to Advance

    THE PULSAR-18 T3 PERIPHERAL SELF-EXPANDABLE STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A MILDLY CALCIFIED LESION (80% STENOSIS DEGREE) IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS PART OF THE MID SFA. THE DEVICE COULD NOT PASS THE LESION. ANOTHER PULSAR-18 T3 WAS USED TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23987108 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 8, 2025Activation Failure; Activation Problem; Activation Failure; Activation Problem

    THE PULSAR-18 T3 PERIPHERAL SELF-EXPANDABLE STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION (90% STENOSIS DEGREE) IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS PART OF THE PROXIMAL SFA. AFTER DELIVERING THE DEVICE TO THE LESION, THE TRIGGER COULD NOT BE MOVED. ANOTHER PULSAR-18 T3 WAS USED TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23740558 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2024Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    AFTER PRE-DILATATION, THE PULSAR-18 T3 PERIPHERAL SELF-EXPANDABLE STENT WAS IMPLANTED BUT THE ANGIOGRAPHY THE LENGTH SEEMED TO BE 20MM SHORTER THAN IT SHOULD BE. THE STENT COULD NOT COVER THE LESION. ANOTHER PULSAR-18 T3 STENT WAS USED TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20065477 ↗

Other STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY devices

All STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page