Skip to content

Pulsar-18 T3 6/80/135Recalls & reported problems

Biotronik AG · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Pulsar-18 T3 (52)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640130446991), received between Aug 18, 2022 and Aug 20, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Failure2
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Fracture1
  • Premature Activation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 20, 2026Premature Activation; Activation Failure

    The Pulsar-18 T3 self-expandable peripheral stent system was selected for treatment of the right SFA. Following pre-dilatation and Shockwave, the device was successfully advanced to the target lesion. An attempt was made to deploy the stent; however, the deployment wheel stopped moving and the stent could not be released. During withdrawal of the device, the stent partially deployed within the introducer sheath. The device was completely removed. There was no harm to the patient.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50339854 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 27, 2024Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    THE PULSAR-18 T3 PERIPHERAL SELF-EXPANDABLE STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF THE LEFT SFA. THE LESION COULD NOT BE CROSSED WITH THE DEVICE. ANOTHER STENT WAS USED TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20791256 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 24, 2024Activation Failure; Activation Failure

    PULSAR-18 T3 PERIPHERAL SELF-EXPANDABLE STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION WITH 60 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE. AFTER PRE-DILATATION, THE DEVICE WAS ADVANCED TO THE LESION BUT THE STENT COULD NOT BE RELEASED. ANOTHER STENT WAS USED TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20521473 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 3, 2022Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    A PULSAR-18 T3 SELF-EXPANDABLE STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. THE DEVICE COULD ONLY BE ADVANCED OVER THE WIRE WITH DIFFICULTY. AFTER THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED, THE STENT SYSTEM COULD NOT BE REMOVED AND EVERYTHING HAD TO BE PULL OUT TOGETHER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15722587 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 18, 2022Fracture; Fracture

    A PULSAR-18 T3 STENT SYSTEM WAS CHOSEN FOR TREATMENT OF A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION (80 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE) IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS PROXIMAL SFA. AFTER PREDILATATION ONE PULSAR-18 T3 WAS IMPLANTED, ANOTHER DILATATION WITH A PASSEO-18 LUX WAS PERFORMED AND THEN A SECOND PULSAR-18 T3 (COMPLAINT DEVICE) WAS IMPLANTED. DURING WITHDRAWAL RESISTANCE WAS FELT. IT WAS DETECTED THAT CA. 15 CM OF THE SHAFT FRACTURED AND REMAINED ON THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. ALL PARTS COULD BE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15250794 ↗

Other STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY devices

All STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page