Skip to content

Pulsar-18 T3 7/200/135Recalls & reported problems

Biotronik AG · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Pulsar-18 T3 (52)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640130447141), received between Dec 14, 2023 and Mar 23, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult or Delayed Activation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult or Delayed Activation2
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2026Material Deformation

    A PULSAR-18 T3 STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A LESION IN THE RIGHT MID SFA. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED. DURING STENT DEPLOYMENT, THE STENT DID NOT REACH ITS INTENDED LENGTH OF 200 MM BUT ONLY APPROXIMATELY 120 MM. A SECOND STENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN OVERLAP IN ORDER TO COVER THE ORIGINAL LESION LENGTH OF 200 MM.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24662090 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2024Difficult or Delayed Activation; Difficult or Delayed Activation

    A PULSAR-18 SELF-EXPANDABLE STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. THE RATCHET RELEASE WHEEL STOPPED PRIOR TO RELEASING THE ENTIRE 200MM STENT. THE OPERATOR WAS ABLE TO GET THE STENT OFF THE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND USED A PTA BALLOON AND STENT TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THE STENT REMAINED IN THE VESSEL AS PLANNED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18737812 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 14, 2023Difficult or Delayed Activation; Difficult or Delayed Activation

    A PULSAR-18 T3 SELF-EXPANDABLE STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. THE DEVICE COULD BE ADVANCED INTO THE CONTRALATERAL FSA. THE RED SAFETY TAB WAS PRESSED AND THE DEPLOYMENT WHEEL TURNED UNTIL IT WAS SUPPOSED TO END. BEFORE REMOVING THE DEVICE, THE DOCTOR NOTICED THAT THE STENT HAD BEEN RELEASED TO 170-180 MM. THE DEPLOYMENT WHEEL WAS THEN PRESSED SEVERAL TIMES. WITH FORCE THE WHEEL COULD THEN BE RELEASED AND TURNED AGAIN, AND THE STENT WAS RELEASED NORMALLY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18330999 ↗

Other STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY devices

All STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page