Skip to content

PK Papyrus 4.0/26/140Recalls & reported problems

Biotronik AG · Class f · Implant

All models of PK Papyrus (17)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640130447295), received between Mar 10, 2022 and Oct 30, 2025 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Lack of Effect” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Lack of Effect3
  • Fracture1
  • Inflation Problem1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • DeathOct 30, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    AFTER PLACING THE PK PAPYRUS COVERED STENT SYSTEM IN THE MID RCA, THERE WAS A "HAZINESS" IN THE DISTAL STENT WITH ST ELEVATIONS BUT IVUS INTERESTINGLY DID NOT SHOW CLEAR EVIDENCE OF THROMBUS. HOWEVER, WITHIN A FEW MINUTES THE VESSEL SHUT DOWN. AFTER BALLOONING IT WAS POSSIBLE TO RESTORE FLOW, BUT AGAIN, THE VESSEL SHUT DOWN AND APPEARED TO SHOW THROMBUS. IT MAY HAVE ALL BEEN RV FAILURE WITH NO REFLOW. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO ICU AND EXPIRED TWO DAYS AFTER PROCEDURE FROM MULTIORGAN FAILURE. THE DEVICE WAS USED AFTER THE EXPIRATION DATE.

    Patient problems: Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

    MAUDE report 23424262 ↗
  • InjuryMay 1, 2023Lack of Effect; Lack of Effect

    THE PK PAPYRUS COVERED STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A TYPE III CS/IV PERFORATION IN THE MID RCA. INITIAL RESULTS LOOKED GOOD WITH TIMI FLOW 3. HOWEVER, OVER TIME POST-PROCEDURE IT APPEARED THAT THE VESSEL WAS DRAINING INTO THE RIGHT ATRIUM. NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED. THE HOSPITALIZATION WAS PROLONGED 2 DAYS.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 16848112 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 17, 2023Lack of Effect; Lack of Effect

    A PK PAPYRUS COVERED STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A TYPE III PERFORATION IN THE MID RCA. THE STENT COULD NOT SEAL THE PERFORATION. THUS, ANOTHER PK PAPYRUS WAS USED, AND SEALED THE PERFORATION SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16755819 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2023Lack of Effect; Lack of Effect

    TWO PK PAPYRUS COVERED STENTS WERE USED TO TRY TO SEAL A TYPE III PERFORATION IN THE PROXIMAL LAD, BUT WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. THE OTHER STENT IS FILED SEPARATELY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16497462 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 5, 2023Inflation Problem; Material Deformation; Inflation Problem; Material Deformation

    A PK PAPYRUS COVERED STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. THE INFLATION LUMEN OF THE DEVICE WAS FOUND KINKED AFTER UNPACKING. HOWEVER, THE DEVICE WAS INSERTED INTO THE PATIENTS BODY BUT COULD NOT BE INFLATED. ANOTHER PK PAPYRUS WAS USED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16103113 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 10, 2022Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    PATIENT HAD AN ANEURYSMAL SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT. IT WAS DECIDED TO RECANALIZE THE NATIVE TOTAL OCCLUDED RCA. DURING TREATMENT A TYPE III PERFORATION OCCURRED IN THE RCA. TO STOP THE BLEEDING, A BALLOON DILATATION WAS PERFORMED BUT UNSUCCESSFULLY. AFTERWARDS, THE PK PAPYRUS COVERED STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. THE STENT WAS INADVERTENTLY DEPLOYED INSIDE THE GUIDING CATHETER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13726667 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 10, 2022Fracture; Fracture

    PATIENT HAD AN ANEURYSMAL SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT. IT WAS DECIDED TO RECANALIZE THE NATIVE TOTAL OCCLUDED RCA. DURING TREATMENT A TYPE III PERFORATION OCCURRED IN THE RCA. TO STOP THE BLEEDING, A BALLOON DILATATION WAS PERFORMED, BUT DURING WITHDRAWAL THE BALLOON SHAFT FRACTURED. THEN THE PK PAPYRUS WAS SELECTED FOR TREATING THE PERFORATION, BUT IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO DELIVER THE DEVICE TO THE LESION AND THE SHAFT BROKE AS WELL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13726575 ↗

Other coronary covered stent devices

All coronary covered stent devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page