Skip to content

Orsiro Mission 4/9/140Recalls & reported problems

Biotronik AG · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Orsiro Mission (49)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07640130455863), received between Feb 26, 2024 and Feb 26, 2024 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Chest Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AN ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. THE TREATED LESION WAS A 100 PERCENT OCCLUDED LARGE OM. A WIRE AND MICROCATHETER WERE USED TO CROSS THE LESION. PRE-DILATATION WAS DONE AND A 3.0/40 ORSIRO WAS PLACED AND POST DILATED. SIGNIFICANT CALCIFICATION WAS NOTED ON IVUS PROXIMAL TO THE STENT AND A ORSIRO MISSION 4.0/9 WAS SELECTED TO PLACE PROXIMAL TO THE PREVIOUS IMPLANTED STENT. WHILE POSITIONING, THE ORSIRO MISSION 4.0/9 STENT CAME OFF THE DELIVERY BALLOON AND MIGRATED DISTALLY TO THE DISTAL VESSEL BUT WAS STILL ON THE WIRE. A BALLOON WAS PLACED INSIDE THE DISLODGED STENT AND INFLATED TO ADHERE THE STENT TO THE WALL OF THE DISTAL OM. A GUIDE EXTENSION WAS THEN USED AND A ORSIRO 4.0/13 WAS PLACED PROXIMAL INSIDE THE ORSIRO 3.0/40. THE PATIENT HAD CONTINUOUS CHEST PAIN THROUGHOUT THE PROCEDURE. A SECOND CATH WAS DONE ON (B)(6) 2024.

    Patient problems: Chest Pain

    MAUDE report 18778803 ↗

Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices

All Coronary drug-eluting stent devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page