Skip to content

Orsiro Mission 4/15/140Recalls & reported problems

Biotronik AG · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Orsiro Mission (49)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640130455986), received between Dec 7, 2021 and Jun 24, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Advance4
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 24, 2026Failure to Advance

    THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF AN UNSPECIFIED LESION IN A SEGMENT OF THE MEDIAL LAD. A PRE-DILATION OF THE LESION WAS PERFORMED. THE AFFECTED DEVICE WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT'S BODY BUT COULD NOT CROSS THE LESION. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FROM THE HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25604239 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 3, 2026Failure to Advance

    THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION (80 % STENOSIS DEGREE) IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS PART OF THE MID RCA. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED, AND THE AFFECTED ORSIRO MISSION WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT'S BODY BUT WAS UNABLE TO CROSS THE LESION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24243129 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 8, 2026Failure to Advance

    THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A LESION IN A BIFURCATION OF THE PROXIMAL LAD. A PREDILATION OF THE LESION WAS PERFORMED. IN ORDER TO PERFORM A DK-CRUSH TECHNIQUE, THE AFFECTED DEVICE WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT'S BODY BUT COULD NOT CROSS THE LESION. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AT THE HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24001089 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 4, 2025Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. THE DEVICE FAILED TO CROSS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23713032 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 7, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AN ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED TO TREAT A LESION IN THE VESSEL SEGMENT MID SVG TO OM. AFTER PLACING THE FIRST STENT IN THE MID SVG, A 2ND STENT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE POSITIONED DISTAL TO THE 1ST STENT BUT COULD NOT PASS THE FIRST STENT. NO INFORMATION ABOUT A POSSIBLE POST-DILATATION OF THE 1ST STENT WAS OBTAINED. IN THE FURTHER COURSE OF THE TREATMENT, A GUIDELINER EXTENSION CATHETER WAS USED FOR EXTRA SUPPORT, BUT THE 2ND STENT COULD STILL NOT PASS AND WAS REMOVED. AFTER REMOVAL, IT WAS DETECTED THAT THE 2ND STENT WAS DISLODGED. THE STENT COULD BE SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12953730 ↗

Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices

All Coronary drug-eluting stent devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page