Orsiro Mission 2.25/18/140Recalls & reported problems
Biotronik AG · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Orsiro Mission (49)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640130455993), received between Oct 28, 2022 and May 5, 2026 — classified as 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Advance4
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
- Material Deformation2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions9
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 5, 2026Failure to Advance
THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION (80 % STENOSIS DEGREE) IN A MILDLY TORTUOUS SEGMENT OF THE MEDIAL RCA. A PRE-DILATION OF THE LESION WAS PER-FORMED. THE AFFECTED DEVICE WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT'S BODY BUT COULD NOT CROSS THE LESION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25080472 ↗MalfunctionApr 22, 2026Material Deformation
THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF THE D1. THE STENT WAS "CRACKED" BEFORE INSERTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24949818 ↗MalfunctionApr 14, 2026Failure to Advance
THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A UNCALCIFIED LESION (90 % STENOSIS DEGREE) IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS SEGMENT OF THE MEDIAL OM1. A PRE-DILATION OF THE LESION WAS PERFORMED. THE AFFECTED DEVICE WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT'S BODY BUT COULD NOT CROSS THE LESION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24870950 ↗MalfunctionApr 10, 2026Failure to Advance
THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A LESION IN AN UNSPECIFIED VESSEL. IT IS UNKNOWN IF A PRE-DILATION OF THE LESION WAS PERFORMED. THE AFFECTED DEVICE WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT'S BODY BUT COULD NOT CROSS THE LESION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24838551 ↗MalfunctionDec 23, 2025Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A LESION WITH 99 % STENOSIS DEGREE IN A SEGMENT OF THE PROXIMAL PDA. A PRE-DILATION OF THE LESION WAS PERFORMED. THE AFFECTED DEVICE WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT'S BODY BUT COULD NOT CROSS THE LESION. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO CROSS THE LESION USING A 2.25/13 ORSIRO MISSION. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AT THE HOSPITAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23874644 ↗MalfunctionJan 20, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation
THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION (90 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE) IN A MODERATE PART OF THE PROXIMAL OM. THE STENT WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT BODY ALONG WITH A GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER AND WIRE. THE LESION WAS NOT CROSSED. THE STENT AND ALL OTHER EQUIPMENT WERE REMOVED. UPON REMOVAL IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT HAD BECOME DAMAGED. A NEW STENT WAS ACQUIRED AND DEPLOYED ALONG WITH ALL OTHER NEW EQUIPMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21193213 ↗MalfunctionApr 12, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AN ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF AN OSTIAL/PROXIMAL LAD 90-PLUS PERCENT LESION WITH SEVERE CALCIFICATION. PRE-DILATATION WAS DONE, AND IT WAS ATTEMPTED TO CROSS WITH THE ORSIRO MISSION THROUGH A 7FR GUIDELINER. SIGNIFICANT RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO CROSS, THE DEVICE DID NOT CROSS. THE ORSIRO MISSION WAS WITHDRAWN, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT WAS NO LONGER ON THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. IMAGING REVEALED THE STENT WAS LOOSE ON THE GUIDE WIRE IN THE LEFT MAIN. A SMALL DIAMETER BALLOON WAS INSERTED OVER THE GW AND PLACED IN THE PROXIMAL SECTION OF THE DES, LOW ATM INFLATION, DES/BALLOON/GUIDE ALL WAS WITHDRAWN. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW GUIDE SYSTEM INSERTED AND A COMPETITIVE STENT USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16724976 ↗MalfunctionMar 7, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THERE WAS A HIGHLY CALCIFIED LESION WHERE A COMPETITOR STENT WOULD NOT CROSS. THEN THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED WHICH CROSSED THE LESION, BUT NOT FULLY. THE ORSIRO MISSION WAS WITHDRAWN THROUGH THE GUIDE, AND IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT WAS NOT ON THE BALLOON, BUT IN THE BODY. THE STENT WAS RETRIEVED. THE INTERVENTION WAS COMPLETED AND THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED WITH NO ISSUES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16497470 ↗MalfunctionOct 28, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AN ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. THE PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO TREAT A MILDLY CALCIFIED LESION (100 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE, VESSEL REFERENCE DIAMETER 2.5 MM, LESION LENGTH 18 MM) IN A MILDLY TORTUOUS PART OF THE DISTAL LCX. IT IS NOTED THAT THERE WAS AN OLDER STENT MORE PROXIMAL TO THE LESION WITH A MILD-MODERATE IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. AFTER PRE-DILATION WITH A 2.0 X 12 MM BALLOON AND SUBSEQUENT THROMBECTOMY, THE COMPLAINT INSTRUMENT WAS INTRODUCED AND ADVANCED TOWARDS THE TARGET LESION IN THE DISTAL LCX BUT COULD NOT CROSS THE PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED STENT IN THE MID LCX. THE COMPLAINT INSTRUMENT WAS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER, AFTER WITHDRAWAL OF THE COMPLAINT INSTRUMENT IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT HAD DISLODGED FROM THE BALLOON. THE DISLODGED STENT WAS LOCATED IN THE PROXIMAL LCX WHERE IT WAS ADAPTED TO THE VESSEL WALL WITH A 3.5 X 12 MM NC BALLOON.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15690790 ↗
Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices
- SYNERGY™ H7493926038300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent8 deaths124 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent7 deaths106 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926020300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent9 deaths90 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016250Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths82 reports
- XIENCE Sierra™ 1550350-33Abbott Vascular Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent1 recall32 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30022UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths76 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926024300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths75 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30015UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths73 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page