Skip to content

Orsiro Mission 2.5/26/140Recalls & reported problems

Biotronik AG · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Orsiro Mission (49)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640130456129), received between Oct 25, 2022 and Jul 21, 2026 — classified as 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 3 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Advance4
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 21, 2026Failure to Advance

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25885277 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 21, 2026Failure to Advance

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25885276 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 7, 2026Failure to Advance

    THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION (90 % STENOSIS DEGREE) IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS SEGMENT OF THE MEDIAL LCX. IT IS UNKNOWN IF A PRE-DILATION OF THE LESION WAS PERFORMED. THE AFFECTED DEVICE WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT'S BODY BUT COULD NOT CROSS THE LESION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25729857 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 3, 2026Failure to Advance

    THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A LESION IN THE MID LAD (90 % STENOSIS DEGREE). THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED WITH AN 2.0 X 8 MM BALLOON. THE AFFECTED ORSIRO MISSION WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT'S BUT COULD NOT CROSS THE LESION. EVENTUALLY, AN ORSIRO MISSION 2.5/22 WAS ABLE TO CROSS AND SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED. POST-DILATION WAS PERFORMED WITH A 3.0 MM BALLOON.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24243130 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 13, 2026Material Deformation

    THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION (90% STENOSIS DEGREE) IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS SEGMENT OF THE PROXIMAL RCA. AFTER PRE-DILATATION AND USING A GUIDELINER, THE ORSIRO MISSION COULD NOT CROSS THE LESION. THE STENT FRAYED UPON REMOVAL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24050720 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 30, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AN ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. UPON REMOVAL OF THE STYLET, THE STENT CAME OFF THE BALLOON. IT WAS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE OPENING AND REMOVING THE STENT FROM THE PACKAGING AND PROTECTIVE HOOP. THIS EVENT OCCURRED OUTSIDE OF THE PATIENT AND THEREFORE THE PATIENT WAS UNHARMED. A SECOND STENT WAS SELECTED AND DEPLOYED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16645954 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 25, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AN ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION (80 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE) IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS MID LAD. IT WAS ATTEMPTED TO CROSS A CHALLENGING LESION IN THE LAD WITH ORSIRO MISSION STENT SYSTEMS AND THE STENTS BECAME DISLODGED. THIS HAPPENED WITH TWO STENTS OF SAME SIZE AND SAME LOT AND IS MORE ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE PROPERTIES OF THE LESION. THE STENTS WERE REMOVED WITH NO COMPLICATION. THIS IS TWO OF TWO.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15670810 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 25, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AN ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION (80 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE) IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS MID LAD. IT WAS ATTEMPTED TO CROSS A CHALLENGING LESION IN THE LAD WITH ORSIRO MISSION STENT SYSTEMS AND THE STENTS BECAME DISLODGED. THIS HAPPENED WITH TWO STENTS OF SAME SIZE AND SAME LOT AND IS MORE ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE PROPERTIES OF THE LESION. THE STENTS WERE REMOVED WITH NO COMPLICATION. THIS IS ONE OF TWO.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15670732 ↗

Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices

All Coronary drug-eluting stent devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page