Skip to content

Orsiro Mission 2.75/30/140Recalls & reported problems

Biotronik AG · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Orsiro Mission (49)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640130456198), received between Apr 13, 2022 and Apr 10, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Advance3
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Failure of Implant1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 10, 2026Failure to Advance

    THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT A LESION IN A SEGMENT OF THE PROXIMAL TO MEDIAL LCX. IT IS UNKNOWN IF A PRE-DILATION OF THE LESION WAS PERFORMED. THE AFFECTED DEVICE WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT'S BODY BUT COULD NOT CROSS THE LESION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24842539 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Failure to Advance

    THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A LESION IN A SEGMENT OF THE MEDIAL LAD. IT IS UNKNOWN IF A PRE-DILATION OF THE LESION WAS PERFORMED. THE AFFECTED DEVICE WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT'S BODY BUT COULD NOT CROSS THE LESION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24615439 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 9, 2025Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    THE ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A LESION WITH 80% STENOSIS DEGREE IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS PART OF THE MID LAD. THE LESION COULD NOT BE CROSSED WITH THE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23754113 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 14, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    AN ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT, WHICH WAS EXPIRED ON 11-FEB-2024, WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024 IN THE LAD. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STAFF ADDED A RED STICKER, INDICATING THE AFFECTED DEVICE WAS EXPIRING SOON, AND IT HAD A 2/24 STICKER. THEREFORE, IT WAS READ OFF AS EXPIRING AT THE END OF THE MONTH. WHEN STAFF REALIZED THE AFFECTED DEVICE HAD ACTUALLY EXPIRED ON THE 11TH, IT HAD ALREADY BEEN INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT, AND THE PHYSICIAN MADE THE DECISION TO DEPLOY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18902592 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 13, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AN ORSIRO MISSION DRUG-ELUTING STENT SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. AFTER WIRING AND PRE-DILATATION, THE LESION IN A VEIN GRAFT WAS SUCCESSFULLY CROSSED. WHILE PULLING THE DEVICE BACK TO RE-POSITION, A SLIGHT CATCH WAS FELT. AT THIS POINT THE DEVICE WOULD NO LONGER ADVANCE. THE DEVICE WAS WITHDRAWN, AND IT WAS DETECTED THAT THE STENT WAS DISLODGED. THE EQUIPMENT WAS LEFT INSIDE THE BODY AND THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 14103640 ↗

Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices

All Coronary drug-eluting stent devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page