Skip to content

OPN NC 300-010-004Recalls & reported problems

SIS Medical AG · OPN NC Ø3.0x10 PTCA catheters · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07640142570561), received between Mar 16, 2025 and Mar 16, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture1

Patient problems

  • Cardiac Arrest1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 16, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    TREATMENT OF MID LAD (LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY) IN-STENT RESTENOSIS WITH MINOR STENT UNDER EXPANSION. STENOSIS DEGREE OF 40%. BALLOON RUPTURE/BURST AFTER 2-4 SECONDS OF INFLATION, AT INFLATION PRESSURE 25 ATM.CARDIOLOGIST SUSPECTED THE OPN BALLOON BURST UPON INFLATION AND WAS THE PROBABLE CAUSE OF THE MECHANISM FOR RUPTURE OF LAD. BALLOON WAS REPORTED TO HAVE SUDDENLY LOST PRESSURE AT 25 ATM DURING INFLATION. OPN BALLOON WAS DEFLATED WITH BLOOD STAINING NOTED IN THE FLUID OF THE INFLATION DEVICE, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH BALLOON RUPTURE. EVIDENCE OF ARTERY RUPTURE NOTED ANGIOGRAPHICALLY. CARDIAC ARREST FOLLOWED. LAD RUPTURE TREATED WITH PAPYRUS COVERED STENT, TAMPONADE WAS DRAINED AND THE PATIENT SUCCESSFULLY RESCUSISTATED AND TRANSFERED TO ICU.

    Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest

    MAUDE report 21615285 ↗

Other Catheters, Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, Percutaneous devices

All Catheters, Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, Percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page