Skip to content

SPI ELEMENT 4.13.944Recalls & reported problems

Thommen Medical AG · Class 2 · Implant

All models of SPI ELEMENT (28)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
9
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640156471359), received between Jan 28, 2019 and Jun 11, 2025 — classified as 9 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate5
  • Loss of Osseointegration4

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration6
  • No Code Available3

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 11, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    IMPLANT DIDN'T ACHIEVE OSSEOINTEGRATION, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, IMMEDIATE IMPLANTATION, MOBILITY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 22183397 ↗
  • InjuryAug 6, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    IMPLANT DIDN'T ACHIEVE OSSEOINTEGRATION, MOBILITY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 19918057 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED. ANOTHER IMPLANT HAS BEEN PLACED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 19283592 ↗
  • InjuryOct 24, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, DIABETES MELLITUS, SMOKER, PAIN, INFLAMMATION, MOBILITY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 17993789 ↗
  • InjuryJul 12, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    IMPLANT DIDN'T ACHIEVE OSSEOINTEGRATION, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, LOCAL INFECTION / SUBACUTE CHRONIC OSTEITIS, INFECTION, NUMBNESS, BLEEDING, MOBILITY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 17303820 ↗
  • InjuryJun 22, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    IMPLANT DIDN'T ACHIEVE OSSEOINTEGRATION, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, NO THREAD TAP USED, IMMEDIATE IMPLANTATION. UNNOTICEABLE WOUND HEALING WITHOUT MARGINAL INFLAMMATION. LACK OF OSSEOINTEGRATION OF THE IMPLANT DETECTED DURING IMPRESSION TAKING (PRESSURE PAIN).

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 17180675 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 3, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, IMPLANT ACHIEVED OSSEOINTEGRATION, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, NO THREAD TAP USED, SMOKER, BIOMECHANICAL OVERLOAD, BRUXISM, PRECEDING/SIMULTANEOUS BONE AUGMENTATION. THE LOOSENING PROBABLY OCCURRED DURING THE INSERTION OF THE NOVALOC ABUTMENT OR DUE TO OVERLOADING. THE 2ND IDENTICAL IMPLANT #16 IS IN FUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9658500 ↗
  • InjuryDec 17, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, IMPLANT ACHIEVED OSSEOINTEGRATION, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, NO THREAD TAP USED, ILLNESS REQUIRING STEROIDS, SMOKER, BIOMECHANICAL OVERLOAD, INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY, PERI-IMPLANTITIS, INFECTION, FISTULA, BLEEDING, INFLAMMATION, MOBILITY.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9479194 ↗
  • InjuryJan 28, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION - PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT ACHIEVED OSSEOINTEGRATION, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED BY BONE. PROGRESSIVE BONE LOSS.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8281181 ↗

Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices

All Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page