SPI ELEMENT 4.13.922Recalls & reported problems
Thommen Medical AG · Class 2 · Implant
All models of SPI ELEMENT (28)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640156471434), received between Jul 20, 2020 and Mar 6, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loss of Osseointegration3
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration2
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 6, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, IMPLANT ACHIEVED OSSEOINTEGRATION, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, NO THREAD TAP USED, INFECTION, ABSCESS.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 24528740 ↗InjuryMar 9, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, IMPLANT ACHIEVED OSSEOINTEGRATION, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, NO THREAD TAP USED, INFECTION, INFLAMMATION.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 16511868 ↗InjuryJul 20, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, IMPLANT ACHIEVED OSSEOINTEGRATION, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, NO THREAD TAP USED, PERI-IMPLANTITIS, INFECTION, SWELLING, FISTULA, ABSCESS, INFLAMMATION.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10294283 ↗
Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page