TOUCH® CMC 1 CTO09Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640181160075), received between Nov 10, 2025 and Sep 23, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjurySep 23, 2026Osseointegration Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

  It was reported that a patient underwent a total joint arthroplasty of Touch CMC1 Prosthesis. Subsequently, the patient underwent revision surgery, due to pain and loosening of the cup. During revision surgery, metallosis was observed, and the stem was found deeper than at primary placement. The cup and neck were revised, and bone resection was performed.

  Patient problems: Implant Pain; Inadequate Osseointegration; Metal Related Pathology

  MAUDE report 50869257 ↗
• InjurySep 23, 2026Mechanical Jam

  It was reported that a patient underwent a total joint arthroplasty of Touch CMC1 Prosthesis. Subsequently, the patient underwent revision surgery, due to a clicking sensation experienced since shortly after the primary placement. During the revision, the neck and cup were extracted, and metallosis was observed.

  Patient problems: Metal Related Pathology

  MAUDE report 50869256 ↗
• InjuryAug 14, 2026Osseointegration Problem

  It was reported that a patient underwent a total joint arthroplasty of Touch CMC1 Prosthesis. Subsequently, due to severe complex regional pain syndrome on postoperative day 4, with no improvement since then, a bone scintigraphy has been achieved, showing increased tracer uptake on both sides. A revision surgery was required 8 months later, during which the cup was not sealed.

  Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

  MAUDE report 50260034 ↗
• InjuryApr 20, 2026Break; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Osseointegration Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY OF TOUCH CMC1 PROSTHESIS ON (B)(6) 2022. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY 4 YEARS AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANTATION DUE TO LOOSENING OF THE TRAPEZIAL CUP. INTRAOPERATIVELY, AN INTRA-PROSTHETIC DISLOCATION WAS IDENTIFIED, ALONG WITH SIGNIFICANT BONE LOSS OF THE TRAPEZIUM ESTIMATED AT 75%.

  Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Osteolysis

  MAUDE report 24927061 ↗
• InjuryApr 16, 2026Loss of Osseointegration; Migration

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY OF TOUCH CMC1 PROSTHESIS ON (B)(6) 2025. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT REPORTED PAIN AND OSTEOLYSIS WAS OBSERVED ON X-RAY. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2026; THE SURGEON REMOVED BONE FROM THE TRAPEZIUM AND POSITIONED THE NEW CUP AT A DEEPER LEVEL. METALLOSIS WAS PRESENT IN TRAPEZIUM.

  Patient problems: Implant Pain; Metal Related Pathology; Osteolysis

  MAUDE report 24899120 ↗
• InjuryMar 6, 2026Fracture

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOUCH CMC1 REVISION ALMOST THREE YEARS POST-OPERATION DUE TO PE LINER BREAKAGE AND METALLOSIS. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A TRAPEZIECTOMY.

  Patient problems: Joint Impingement; Metal Related Pathology

  MAUDE report 24532908 ↗
• InjuryFeb 16, 2026Fracture; Material Deformation

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY IN 2022. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION ON (B)(6) 2025 DUE TO LINER FRACTURE. THE SURGEON DID NOT NOTICE THAT THE PROSTHESIS HAD BEEN FITTED TOO TIGHTLY WHEN HE RECEIVED THE PATIENT. THE CUP IS DAMAGED BECAUSE HE HAD TO USE INSTRUMENTS TO EXTRACT IT. THE NECK AND THE CUP WERE REVISED.

  Patient problems: Joint Impingement; Metal Related Pathology

  MAUDE report 24344847 ↗
• InjuryFeb 6, 2026Material Deformation

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 45-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PERSISTENT PAIN FROM THE FIRST MONTHS POSTOPERATIVELY (INITIAL SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023). SUBSEQUENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2026, A REVISION SURGERY WAS REQUIRED DURING WHICH THE SURGEON REPLACED THE CUP AND THE NECK.

  Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Impingement; Metal Related Pathology

  MAUDE report 24278832 ↗
• InjuryNov 10, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISON SURGERY FOLLOWING INTRA-PROSTHETIC CONFLICT, LOOSENING, PAIN AND METALLOSIS. HE HAD NO TRAUMA. HE FELT COMFORTABLE FOR THE FIRST COUPLE OF MONTHS AND THEN BECAME PROGRESSIVELY PAINFUL. PATIENT EXPRESSED PAIN IN HAND AROUND MAY TIME. SURGEON SUSPECTED CUP LOOSENING AND DECIDED TO BRING HIM BACK FOR A REVISION OF CUP AND NECK. UPON REVISION, A LOT OF METALLOSIS WITHIN JOINT, SMALL FRAGMENT OF METAL WERE NOTED, SURGEON REMOVED A LOT OF THE BLACK TISSUE AND TOOK SPECIMENS AS VARIOUS POINTS. THE CUP AND STEM WERE WELL INTEGRATED INTO THE BONE HOWEVER THERE WAS BONE LOSS IN BOTH THE PROXIMAL METACARPAL AND DISTAL TRAPEZIUM. THE SURGEON PROCEEDED BY REMOVING ALL IMPLANTS AND BLACK TISSUES.

  Patient problems: Implant Pain; Metal Related Pathology

  MAUDE report 23510762 ↗