Skip to content

SPI®NEVO MC INICELL®, healing cap incl., PF 4.0, endosseous Ø 4.0 mm, L 9.5 mm 4.23.823Recalls & reported problems

Thommen Medical AG · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640182643850), received between Sep 18, 2025 and May 19, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 2 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate4
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 19, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, IMPLANT ACHIEVED OSSEOINTEGRATION, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, NO THREAD TAP USED, BONE RESORPTION, MOBILITY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 25214930 ↗
  • InjuryApr 8, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED, INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 24813058 ↗
  • InjuryApr 7, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED, INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 24801402 ↗
  • InjuryDec 30, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED, NO THREAD TAP USED - ANOTHER SIZE OF IMPLANT WAS CHOSEN.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 23920071 ↗
  • InjurySep 18, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    IMPLANT DIDN'T ACHIEVE OSSEOINTEGRATION, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, NO THREAD TAP USED, DIABETES MELLITUS, SMOKER, INFLAMMATION, MOBILITY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 23081755 ↗

Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices

All Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page