Skip to content

SPI®NEVO MC INICELL®, healing cap incl., PF 3.5, endosseous Ø 3.5 mm, L 12.5 mm 4.23.815Recalls & reported problems

Thommen Medical AG · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640182643881), received between Nov 27, 2025 and Aug 26, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate5
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration6

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 26, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Implant didn't achieve osseointegration.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 50450629 ↗
  • InjuryApr 13, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    IMPLANT DIDN'T ACHIEVE OSSEOINTEGRATION.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 24855514 ↗
  • InjuryMar 23, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IMPLANT LOSS DUE TO BROKEN LOCATOR, IMPLANT ACHIEVED OSSEOINTEGRATION, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, NO THREAD TAP USED, SMOKER, TRAUMA / ACCIDENT.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 24659996 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED, IMPLANT WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, NO THREAD TAP USED,C OMPLICATION IN SITE PREPARATION, IMMEDIATE IMPLANTATION, MOBILITY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 24466385 ↗
  • InjuryDec 29, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 23905502 ↗
  • InjuryNov 27, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    IMPLANT DIDN'T ACHIEVE OSSEOINTEGRATION.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 23664109 ↗

Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices

All Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page