Skip to content

Neodent 109.143Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · TITAMAX IMPLANT WITH MOUNT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07898237566689), received between Nov 10, 2017 and Sep 28, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate3
  • Fracture1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Tissue Damage2
  • Complaint, Ill-Defined1
  • Fibrosis1
  • Fistula1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 28, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50922963 ↗
  • InjuryOct 29, 2021Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN FDI 31. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2020, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY AND FISTULA. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Fistula

    MAUDE report 12717423 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THE LOSS OF THE DENTAL IMPLANT, BUT DID NOT PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE.

    Patient problems: Complaint, Ill-Defined

    MAUDE report 7030544 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Fracture; Fracture

    (B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, AROUND 8 YEARS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #13, ITS FRACTURE WAS OBSERVED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7021777 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 3 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #28, IT WAS VERIFIED ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION. FIFTY NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND IMMEDIATE LOAD WAS NOT PERFORMED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE I.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7017384 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page