Skip to content

Neodent 109.152Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · TITAMAX SMART IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07898237566726), received between Nov 10, 2017 and Aug 22, 2019 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate5

Patient problems

  • Tissue Damage5
  • Pain2
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 22, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4)- THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 3 MONTHS AND 23 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. MOREOVER, 35N.CM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8921923 ↗
  • InjuryJul 22, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 1 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. MOREOVER, THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8811774 ↗
  • InjuryJul 11, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 1 MONTH AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8782625 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 3 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #27, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT IMMEDIATELY LOAD AND THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE III.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7021332 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 1 MONTH AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7020044 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page