Skip to content

Neodent 109.163Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · TITAMAX SMART IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07898237566771), received between Nov 10, 2017 and Aug 29, 2018 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Tissue Damage4
  • Pain2
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 29, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 19 DAYS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 30#, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7830138 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    RP 011820 - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT NEARLY 1 MONTH AFTER DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, IT HAD TO BE REMOVED BECAUSE THE PATIENT WAS IN PAIN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7508967 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    RP.005904 - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 7 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE III.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7020799 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 6 MONTHS AFTER TWO DENTAL IMPLANTS WERE INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGIONS #4 AND #13, IT WAS VERIFIED THEIR NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION. THE PATIENT PRESENTED INSUFFICIENT BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY (BONE TYPE IV) AND IMMEDIATE LOAD WAS PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7018249 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page