Neodent 109.328Recalls & reported problems
JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · Ti TITAMAX IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 22
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 22
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 22 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07898237567136), received between Nov 10, 2017 and Nov 6, 2025 — classified as 22 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (17 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate17
- Loss of Osseointegration4
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- Tissue Damage12
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
- Pain3
- Complaint, Ill-Defined2
- Fibrosis1
- Swelling1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 22 most recent of 22 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 6, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, SINUS AUGMENTATION AND IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH POOR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23489438 ↗InjuryJun 17, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2020 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22247640 ↗InjuryJan 29, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2023 IN FDI 46. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18600687 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2023Fracture; Fracture
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2014 IN FDI 37. ON (B)(6) 2023, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BRUXISM. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16934402 ↗InjuryApr 21, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16790216 ↗InjuryNov 14, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15794091 ↗InjuryNov 14, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN FDI 36. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BRUXISM. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain
MAUDE report 15792328 ↗InjuryJul 4, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 46. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14909477 ↗InjurySep 24, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2020 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2020, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 10581685 ↗InjuryAug 10, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2014 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2014, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 10386999 ↗InjuryNov 6, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
(B)(4) ¿ THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 2 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 9286515 ↗InjuryDec 20, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
(B)(4)¿ THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 8185374 ↗InjurySep 5, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
(B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 6 MONTHS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 30#, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED INSUFFICIENT BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY (BONE TYPE III).
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 7848356 ↗InjuryAug 29, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
(B)(6) ¿ THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 24 DAYS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 18#, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. 40 NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, IMMEDIATE LOAD WAS PERFORMED AND THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.
Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7829168 ↗InjuryAug 29, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
(B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 5 MONTHS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 14#, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. A 30NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE III AND BONE GRAFT WAS EXECUTED.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 7829062 ↗InjuryMay 18, 2018Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
(B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT AFTER 6 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 30#, ITS LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. IN ADDITION, 40NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE III.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 7525395 ↗InjuryNov 14, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
(B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 10 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. FORTY NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Pain; Swelling; Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 7030961 ↗InjuryNov 14, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
(B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THE LOSS OF THE DENTAL IMPLANT, BUT DID NOT PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE.
Patient problems: Complaint, Ill-Defined
MAUDE report 7030539 ↗InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
(B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 3 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #31, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. TWENTY NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND THE IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT IMMEDIATELY LOAD. THE PATIENT PRESENTED INSUFFICIENT BONE QUALITY/ QUANTITY (BONE TYPE III).
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 7020462 ↗InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
(B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 4 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, AT THE TIME OF UNCOVERING TO PERFORM THE PATIENT¿S PROSTHETIC REHABILITATION, IT WAS SEEN THAT THE DENTAL IMPLANT HAD NOT OSSEOINTEGRATED.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 7020288 ↗InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
(B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT THE DENTAL IMPLANT DID NOT OSSEOINTEGRATE. THE PATIENT PRESENTED INSUFFICIENT QUALITY/ QUANTITY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 7019434 ↗InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
(B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THE OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE OF A DENTAL IMPLANT, BUT DID NOT PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE.
Patient problems: Complaint, Ill-Defined
MAUDE report 7018986 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page