Skip to content

Neodent 109.634Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · CM TITAMAX IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
19
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
19
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 19 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07898237568829), received between Nov 9, 2017 and Dec 29, 2025 — classified as 19 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (17 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate17
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Loss of Osseointegration2

Patient problems

  • Tissue Damage7
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • Pain5
  • Fibrosis4
  • Unspecified Infection4
  • Inflammation2
  • Abscess1
  • Complaint, Ill-Defined1

Recent adverse event reports

The 19 most recent of 19 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 29, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23915405 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 45. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2025 , NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 22276905 ↗
  • InjuryNov 20, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023, IN FDI 44. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, MOBILITY, BLEEDING AND ABSCESS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Abscess; Fibrosis; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain

    MAUDE report 18178053 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15792295 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2022 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15791217 ↗
  • InjuryAug 18, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2021 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15252788 ↗
  • InjuryAug 18, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2021 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15252770 ↗
  • InjuryApr 26, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14211634 ↗
  • InjuryJul 15, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2020 IN FDI 43. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE AND IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2021, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 12175647 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 1, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THAT THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN ADA 9, FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, MOBILITY AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 11261001 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 1, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THAT THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN ADA 9, FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, MOBILITY AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 11260277 ↗
  • InjuryMar 11, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) ¿ THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 1 MONTH AND 15 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 28#, ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. MOREOVER, 35N.CM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 9819842 ↗
  • InjuryMar 11, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 1 MONTH AND 15 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 25#, ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. MOREOVER, 35N.CM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 9819299 ↗
  • InjuryDec 19, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) ¿ THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. 60NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND IMMEDIATE LOAD PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8181021 ↗
  • InjuryDec 19, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) ¿ THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. 60 NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND IMMEDIATE LOAD PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8181018 ↗
  • InjuryJun 6, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT NEARLY 2 MONTHS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE I, IMMEDIATE IMPLANT WAS PERFORMED, BONE GRAFT WAS EXECUTED AND BIOMECHANICAL OVERLOAD HAS OCCURRED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7574736 ↗
  • InjuryNov 15, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 5 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #29, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7032345 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THE LOSS OF THE DENTAL IMPLANT, BUT DID NOT PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE.

    Patient problems: Complaint, Ill-Defined

    MAUDE report 7031053 ↗
  • InjuryNov 9, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 7 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #23, IT WAS VERIFIED ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION. 32 NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II AND FENESTRATION OCCURRED DURING SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7015995 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page