Skip to content

Neodent 109.781Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · TITAMAX SMART EX IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07898237569895), received between Nov 9, 2017 and Oct 7, 2019 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate5
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Tissue Damage6
  • Pain4
  • Swelling2
  • Failure of Implant1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 7, 2019Fracture; Fracture

    (B)(4)- THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 7 MONTHS AND 9 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 30#, ITS FRACTURE WAS OBSERVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 9161678 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 2, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 1 MONTH AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT IMMEDIATELY LOAD.

    Patient problems: Pain; Swelling; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7237289 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 2, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 1 MONTH AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT IMMEDIATELY LOAD.

    Patient problems: Pain; Swelling; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7237267 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 1, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 2 MONTHS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #30, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT IMMEDIATELY LOAD.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7235235 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #13, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. A 35 NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE III.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7020074 ↗
  • InjuryNov 9, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 3 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAO0RAL REGION #29 IT WAS VERIFIED ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION. IMMEDIATE LOAD WAS NOT PERFORMED AND THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7012955 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page