Skip to content

Neodent 140.755Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · Ti DRIVE ACQUA IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
13
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
13
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 13 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07899878017103), received between Nov 10, 2017 and Apr 27, 2026 — classified as 13 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (10 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration10
  • Failure to Osseointegrate3

Patient problems

  • Pain8
  • Fibrosis4
  • Tissue Damage3
  • Inflammation2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Fistula1
  • Swelling1
  • Swelling/ Edema1

Recent adverse event reports

The 13 most recent of 13 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 27, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 42. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 25007336 ↗
  • InjuryJun 5, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 32. ON (B)(6) 2023, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain

    MAUDE report 17065491 ↗
  • InjuryJun 5, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 33. ON (B)(6) 2023, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain

    MAUDE report 17062031 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 41. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2023, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 16803712 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 31. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2023, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 16803617 ↗
  • InjuryNov 25, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 41. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15866136 ↗
  • InjuryNov 25, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 31. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15866127 ↗
  • InjuryJul 11, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 12. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, SWELLING AND FISTULA. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fistula; Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 14980829 ↗
  • InjurySep 13, 2021Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 23. ON (B)(6) 2021, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 12463230 ↗
  • InjuryNov 13, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2014 IN FDI 11. DETAILS OF SURGERY: SINUS AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2020, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND BRUXISM. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 10838491 ↗
  • InjuryJan 15, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) ¿ THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8249315 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 3 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #7, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE 20 NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND THE IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT IMMEDIATELY LOAD. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE III AND BONE GRAFT WAS PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7021906 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 2 WEEKS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #25, ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. A 45 NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND THE IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT IMMEDIATELY LOADING. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.

    Patient problems: Pain; Swelling; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7019356 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page