Skip to content

Neodent 140.758Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · Ti DRIVE ACQUA IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
11
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07899878017134), received between Nov 10, 2017 and Oct 18, 2021 — classified as 11 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (11 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate11

Patient problems

  • Tissue Damage7
  • Pain3
  • Fistula2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 18, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2021 IN FDI 26. DETAILS OF SURGERY: SINUS AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2021, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: FISTULA. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fistula

    MAUDE report 12650585 ↗
  • InjuryOct 18, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2021 IN FDI 27. DETAILS OF SURGERY: SINUS AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2021, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: FISTULA. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fistula

    MAUDE report 12650418 ↗
  • InjuryJul 5, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2021 IN FDI 26. DETAILS OF SURGERY: SINUS AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2021, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12118272 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2020 IN FDI 26. DETAILS OF SURGERY: SINUS AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2020, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 10169337 ↗
  • InjuryJan 17, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) ¿ THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT ALMOST 4 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8258717 ↗
  • InjuryAug 29, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 6 MONTHS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 7#, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED INSUFFICIENT BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY (BONE TYPE III), IMMEDIATE LOAD WAS PERFORMED AND BONE GRAFT WAS EXECUTED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7829142 ↗
  • InjuryJan 2, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 3 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #24, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7157268 ↗
  • InjuryJan 2, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 1 MONTH AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #3, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7157258 ↗
  • InjuryDec 27, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) ¿ THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, ALMOST 2 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #3, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7147461 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 90 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. A 25 NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7018881 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 1 WEEK AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #4, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THE IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT IMMEDIATELY LOADING. THE PATIENT PRESENTED INSUFFICIENT BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7018786 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page