Skip to content

Neodent 140.759Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · Ti DRIVE ACQUA IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07899878017141), received between Nov 14, 2017 and Sep 23, 2019 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate4

Patient problems

  • Tissue Damage4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 23, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 4 MONTHS AND 16 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 4#, ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. MOREOVER, 30N.CM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED, THE PATIENT PRESENTED INSUFFICIENT BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY (BONE TYPE III) AND BONE GRAFT WAS PLACED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 9106351 ↗
  • InjuryDec 7, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 5 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 16#, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. IN ADDITION, BONE GRAFT WAS EXECUTED.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8143490 ↗
  • InjuryAug 29, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4)¿ THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT ALMOST 6 MONTHS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION 12#, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. 20 NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE III.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7828795 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4) ¿ THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, ONE MONTH AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #8; ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. TWENTY NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND IMMEDIATELY LOAD WAS PERFORMED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE III.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7031047 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page