Neodent 140.760Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07899878017158), received between Nov 10, 2017 and Aug 21, 2020 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (8 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryAug 21, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

  THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2020 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2020, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

  Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

  MAUDE report 10438406 ↗
• InjuryAug 21, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

  THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2020 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2020, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

  Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

  MAUDE report 10438385 ↗
• InjuryAug 21, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

  THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2020 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2020, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

  Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

  MAUDE report 10438333 ↗
• InjuryMar 21, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

  (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 3 MONTHS AND 3 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #3, ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. MOREOVER, THE PATIENT PRESENTED INSUFFICIENT BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY (BONE TYPE IV) AND BONE GRAFT WAS PLACED.

  Patient problems: Tissue Damage

  MAUDE report 8441514 ↗
• InjuryJan 23, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

  (B)(4): THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 6 MONTHS AFTER DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #9, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. THIRTY (30) NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND THE IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT IMMEDIATELY LOAD. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.

  Patient problems: Fistula; Tissue Damage

  MAUDE report 7213736 ↗
• InjuryNov 14, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

  (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT, 5 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #5, ITS NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. TWENTY NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND THE IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT IMMEDIATELY LOAD.

  Patient problems: Tissue Damage

  MAUDE report 7030285 ↗
• InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

  (B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THE DENTAL IMPLANT FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE, BUT DID NOT PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE.

  Patient problems: Complaint, Ill-Defined

  MAUDE report 7018792 ↗
• InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

  (B)(4) - THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 4 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #8, IT WAS VERIFIED ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION. THE 28 NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND IMMEDIATE LOAD WAS NOT PERFORMED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BONE TYPE II.

  Patient problems: Tissue Damage

  MAUDE report 7018028 ↗