Neodent 140.762Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07899878017172), received between Nov 10, 2017 and Nov 10, 2017 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

  (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 40 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGION #3 IT WAS VERIFIED ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION. TWENTY NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND IMMEDIATE LOAD WAS NOT EXECUTED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED INSUFFICIENT BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY (BONE TYPE IV).

  Patient problems: Fistula; Swelling; Tissue Damage

  MAUDE report 7017321 ↗
• InjuryNov 10, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

  (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 20 DAYS AFTER TWO DENTAL IMPLANTS WERE INSTALLED IN INTRAORAL REGIONS #18 AND #19 IT WAS VERIFIED THEIR NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION. 20 NCM OF PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AND IMMEDIATE LOAD WAS NOT EXECUTED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED INSUFFICIENT BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY (BONE TYPE III), FENESTRATION OCCURRED DURING SURGERY AND BONE GRAFT WAS EXECUTED.

  Patient problems: Pain; Swelling; Tissue Damage

  MAUDE report 7017253 ↗