Neodent 109.999Recalls & reported problems
JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · CM DRIVE IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07899878023388), received between Dec 15, 2017 and Sep 19, 2018 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loss of Osseointegration2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Failure to Osseointegrate1
Patient problems
- Tissue Damage3
- Failure of Implant1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 19, 2018Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTED THAT NEARLY 1.5 YEARS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT AND TEMPORARY MULTI-UNIT ABUTMENTS WERE PLACED IN ADA SITE 13 IN THE MOUTH, THE IMPLANT LOST OSSEOINTEGRATION. CLINICIAN REPORTS PATIENT HAD A BIOMECHANICAL OVERLOAD. THE PRODUCT WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 7889465 ↗InjuryMay 10, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE CLINICIAN REPORTED THAT ON THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN ADA SITE #14 IN THE MOUTH, A FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. ANOTHER IMPLANT WAS NOT PLACED IN THE SAME SITE ON THE SAME DAY. CLINICIAN REPORTS NO PRIMARY STABILITY. THE SITE WAS GRAFTED. THE PRODUCT WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. THERE WERE NO REPORTED COMPLICATIONS. (B)(4).
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 7502603 ↗InjuryDec 15, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTED THAT FIVE MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS PLACED, IN INTRAORAL SITE #6 OF THE PATIENT¿S MOUTH, NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED. PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. IMMEDIATE LOAD WAS PERFORMED. THE DEVICE WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. THERE WERE NO REPORTED POST- OPERATIVE PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. (B)(4).
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 7123150 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page