Skip to content

Neodent 109.1006Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · CM DRIVE IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07899878023463), received between Jul 3, 2018 and Jul 17, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 2 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Failure to Osseointegrate1

Patient problems

  • Fibrosis2
  • Tissue Damage2

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 17, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2017 IN ADA 13. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 25860254 ↗
  • InjuryJul 17, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2017 IN ADA 13. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 25858712 ↗
  • InjuryOct 24, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTED THAT ON THE DAY THE IMMEDIATE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN ADA SITE 13 IN THE MOUTH, PRIMARY STABILITY WAS NOT OBTAINED IN TYPE III BONE. CLINICIAN NOTED PATIENT'S INSUFFICIENT BONE QUALITY. ANOTHER IMPLANT WAS NOT PLACED IN THE SAME SITE. THE PRODUCT WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8002623 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTED THAT NEARLY 4 MONTHS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT AND ABUTMENT WERE PLACED IN ADA SITE 16 THE MOUTH, THE IMPLANT HAD NOT YET ACHIEVED OSSEOINTEGRATION IN TYPE II BONE. THE PRODUCT WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. THERE WERE NO REPORTED COMPLICATIONS. (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 7658897 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page