Skip to content

Neodent 109.902Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · GM TITAMAX IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Neodent GM Titamax implant is a root-form dental implant. Reports mostly describe failure to bond with surrounding bone, leading to peri-implantitis, pain, inflammation, and implant mobility. There are 80 reports naming it, all involving injuries, with no deaths. No recalls name this device. Reports fell from 20 to 7 in the most recent 12 months compared with the prior 12 months.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
83
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
83
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 83 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07899878023913), received between Oct 21, 2019 and Sep 18, 2026 — classified as 83 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (70 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 3 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 3 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 2 reportsAug 2024: 2 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 7 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 4 reportsFeb 2025: 3 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 7 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 2 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 3 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520267
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate70
  • Loss of Osseointegration8
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Fracture1
  • Separation Failure1

Patient problems

  • Fibrosis39
  • Unspecified Infection29
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions25
  • Pain23
  • Inflammation12
  • Fistula5
  • Hyperresponsive to stimuli2
  • Swelling/ Edema2

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 83 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 18, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50826844 ↗
  • InjurySep 7, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50655935 ↗
  • InjurySep 7, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50655630 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6)2026 in FDI 42. On (b)(6)2026, non-osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type III. No product was returned to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis and Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50284770 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in FDI 34. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type III and fair oral hygiene. No product was returned to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50044629 ↗
  • InjuryMay 21, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, MOBILITY, INCREASED SENSITIVITY AND ABSCESS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Abscess; Fibrosis; Hyperresponsive to stimuli; Pain

    MAUDE report 25246014 ↗
  • InjuryApr 14, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24875927 ↗
  • InjuryJan 6, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 26. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23978919 ↗
  • InjuryJan 6, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23978893 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 37. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23695758 ↗
  • InjuryOct 7, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 37. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE AND BONE OVERHEATING. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS, PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23237280 ↗
  • InjurySep 19, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 22. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, MOBILITY, SWELLING AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation; Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 23099577 ↗
  • InjurySep 16, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 46. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND FISTULA. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fistula; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23065752 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2021 IN FDI 46. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2024, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 22276867 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 46. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 22269212 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 46. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2023 NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 22269158 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 36. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 22263880 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 46. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 22256796 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 22234171 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 12. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, MOBILITY, SWELLING AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 22228724 ↗
  • InjuryMar 11, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 21576429 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 13, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 24. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21378265 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 13, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 25. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21378232 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 10, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21348843 ↗
  • InjuryJan 23, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2021 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2024, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation

    MAUDE report 21222761 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page