Skip to content

Neodent 140.900Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · GM TITAMAX ACQUA IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
13
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
13
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 13 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07899878024637), received between Aug 23, 2019 and Mar 30, 2026 — classified as 13 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (12 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 2 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 3 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate12
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
  • Fibrosis4
  • Tissue Damage2
  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Hyperresponsive to stimuli1
  • Inflammation1
  • Pain1
  • Sinus Perforation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 13 most recent of 13 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24734709 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24733771 ↗
  • InjuryMar 12, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6)2025 IN FDI 46. ON (B)(6)2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 24583403 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 44. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22276934 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22234618 ↗
  • InjuryJan 6, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2024 , NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21084876 ↗
  • InjurySep 10, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN ADA 22. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND SINUS PERFORATION. ON (B)(6) 2024, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Sinus Perforation

    MAUDE report 20183279 ↗
  • InjuryJul 22, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN FDI 47. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19797631 ↗
  • InjuryJun 13, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14679049 ↗
  • InjuryJun 4, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2021 IN FDI 36. ON (B)(6) 2021, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 11940827 ↗
  • InjurySep 25, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2019 IN FDI 25. ON (B)(6) 2019, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 10588332 ↗
  • InjuryMay 19, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2019- IN FDI 36. ON (B)(6) 2020 , NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, MOBILITY AND INCREASED SENSITIVITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hyperresponsive to stimuli; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10069178 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    (B)(4). THE DENTIST REPORTED THAT 1 MONTH AND 10 DAYS AFTER THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS INSTALLED IN PATIENT¿S MOUTH, ITS NON- OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS OBSERVED.

    Patient problems: Pain; Tissue Damage

    MAUDE report 8926524 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page