Skip to content

Neodent 140.964Recalls & reported problems

JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S/A. · GM DRIVE ACQUA IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Neodent GM Drive Acqua implant is a root-form implant placed in bone. All 171 reports are filed as injuries, and most describe the implant failing to bond with the bone or losing that bond, with some noting pain, infection, or bleeding. The reports mention no deaths, and no recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
174
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
174
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 174 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07899878025092), received between Mar 2, 2019 and Sep 18, 2026 — classified as 174 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (116 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 4 reportsJan 2024: 2 reportsFeb 2024: 4 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 2 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 4 reportsAug 2024: 8 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 10 reportsNov 2024: 14 reportsDec 2024: 4 reportsJan 2025: 2 reportsFeb 2025: 2 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 5 reportsJul 2025: 5 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 2 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 3 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 9 reportsMar 2026: 3 reportsApr 2026: 2 reportsMay 2026: 2 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 3 reportsAug 2026: 4 reportsSep 2026: 2 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202614
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate116
  • Loss of Osseointegration38
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem11
  • Difficult to Insert10

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions78
  • Fibrosis65
  • Pain51
  • Unspecified Infection29
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding17
  • Inflammation16
  • Swelling/ Edema11
  • Hyperresponsive to stimuli8

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 174 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 18, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50827658 ↗
  • InjurySep 18, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50824480 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 50417316 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in ADA 10. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Pain and Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 50413257 ↗
  • InjuryAug 14, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    The clinician reports that the day the implant was placed in ADA 19, failure occurred upon insertion. Details of surgery: Primary stability not achieved and Immediate extraction site. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50259737 ↗
  • InjuryAug 14, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    The clinician reports that the day the implant was placed in ADA 19, failure occurred upon insertion. Details of surgery: Primary stability not achieved and Immediate extraction site. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50258167 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Difficult to Insert

    The clinician reports that the day the implant was placed in FDI 36, failure occurred upon insertion. Details of surgery: Primary stability not achieved and Implant surface not completely covered with bone. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50044799 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 25723930 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 15. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, MOBILITY AND BLEEDING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain

    MAUDE report 25723850 ↗
  • InjuryMay 15, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 20. ON (B)(6) 2026 NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25190746 ↗
  • InjuryMay 15, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 20. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25188068 ↗
  • InjuryApr 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 8. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25007643 ↗
  • InjuryApr 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 8. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25003122 ↗
  • InjuryMar 26, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 44. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24705366 ↗
  • InjuryMar 16, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 16. DETAILS OF SURGERY: SINUS PERFORATION. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Sinus Perforation

    MAUDE report 24611296 ↗
  • InjuryMar 16, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 16. DETAILS OF SURGERY: SINUS PERFORATION. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Sinus Perforation

    MAUDE report 24608785 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 26. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24460689 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 20, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 29. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation

    MAUDE report 24404429 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 19, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS, PAIN AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24392347 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 16, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, MOBILITY AND BLEEDING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain

    MAUDE report 24348811 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 9, 2026Difficult to Insert

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THAT THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN FDI 16, FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 24298196 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 30. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PAIN, MOBILITY AND ABSCESS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Abscess; Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24282252 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 30. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PAIN, MOBILITY AND ABSCESS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Abscess; Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24281074 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 5, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 13. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY AND PREVIOUS BONE AUGMENTATION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PERI-IMPLANTITIS, MOBILITY, SWELLING AND BLEEDING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24271799 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 5, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 13. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY AND PREVIOUS BONE AUGMENTATION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PERI-IMPLANTITIS, MOBILITY, SWELLING AND BLEEDING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24270935 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page