Skip to content

CARBOMEDICS OPTIFORM F7-033Recalls & reported problems

Corcym Srl · Class 3 · Implant

All models of CARBOMEDICS OPTIFORM (6)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08022057012883), received between Mar 7, 2021 and Mar 7, 2021 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Open or Close” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Open or Close1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2021Difficult to Open or Close; Difficult to Open or Close

    ON 05 FEB 2021, A CARBOMEDICS OPTIFORM PROSTHESIS F7-033 WAS INTENDED AS PART OF A MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT¿S PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS WAS OF MITRAL VALVE ENDOCARDITIS. AFTER EXPOSURE OF THE MITRAL VALVE, THE ANTERIOR LEAFLET WAS EXCISED, WHILE THE POSTERIOR LEAFLET AND THE SUBVALVULAR APPARATUS WERE PRESERVED. THE PROSTHESIS WAS IMPLANTED IN ANTI-ANATOMICAL POSITION. AFTER WEANING FROM BYPASS, THE PROSTHESIS FUNCTIONALITY WAS CHECKED AT THE TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAM (TEE) AND AN INTERMITTENT BLOCKAGE OF THE POSTERIOR LEAFLET OF THE PROSTHESIS IN THE CLOSE POSITION WAS DETECTED. THE CROSS-CLAMP WAS RE-STARTED, AND THE VALVE WAS CHECKED. THE INSPECTION OF THE PROSTHESIS DID NOT FIND THE CAUSE OF THE LEAFLET BLOCKAGE. THERE WAS NO RESIDUAL CORD THAT COULD INTERFERE WITH THE OPENING OF THE VALVE. THE THREADS WERE CUT FLUSH. THE MOBILITY OF THE LEAFLETS WITH THE TESTER APPEARED NORMAL. THE PROSTHESIS WAS ROTATED TO THE ANATOMICAL POSITION. AFTER DE-CLAMPING, THE PROSTHESIS WAS CHECKED AGAIN AT THE TEE AND AN ASYNCHRONOUS MOBILITY OF THE LEAFLETS WAS DETECTED WITH A NEW BLOCKING WHEN CLOSING THE REAR LEAFLET. THE VALVE WAS ULTIMATELY EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WIT

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11429731 ↗

Other HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL devices

All HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page